Open katieb1 opened 4 years ago
The feedback summary in issue #73 should be a good starting point for a lot of the prompt questions above.
Some feedback items that I tried to address:
Jarvis has correctly noted that due to the circumstance and noise in the lab room, our peers weren't really able to use and absorb the functionality of the app in detail. Some feedback items can likely be attributed to this circumstance, and may not need to be actioned
Feedback:
Feedback Reflection:
Maintenance Strategy:
Maintenance Performed:
Reflection: I am very happy with how version 1 of our app turned out. I know there are more features to add, and I plan to add some, but we did a very good job making an interactive dashboard that could provide the user with real value. Additionally, the feedback didn't find any bugs or major issues which speaks to the quality of what we produced in version 1. Our effort put into making the app aesthetically pleasing was noticed by users, and doesn't need much improvement, if any. I think we did an excellent job of addressing our initial research questions.
Alright, I have incorporated your discussion points and added my own points as well into our new reflection. Please take a look at the pull request and let me know if we should add/change/delete anything.
We need to update the reflection to incorporate the following:
[x] Start with the reflection.md file you included with milestone2
[ ] Make any necessary edits or changes (for e.g., if you indicated in your milestone2 reflection that your app had a bug and you fixed it in week 3, you should update your reflections file)
[ ] Wishlist features/bug-fixes
[ ] If there is anything you wish you had more time to implement or fix, you can list it here.
[ ] Include a brief, high-level summary of any changes you decided to make
[ ] Provide a brief, high-level summary of the feedback you received during the lab session
Examples of questions we can answer for this part are as follows:
Reflect on the usability of your app. How easy or hard was it for your peers to use your app? Did you expect them to use the app in they way they did?
What things did you hear that's similar across reviewers? Is there a theme here?
From the feedback, what things do you think are appropriate to change in your app, particularly given the time frame you have to improve the app?
What is unreasonable to change, and why? Time restraints? Too technical?
What feedback was the most/least valuable?
What part of the feedback process was most/least valuable?
What did you learn from your experience being a "fly-on-the-wall". Was this useful? Why or why not?
Did the feedback process lead to an improved app? What parts were valuable? What parts were not valuable?
[ ] Reflect on the feedback you received (more guidance is below)