UBC-MDS / aridanalysis_py

DSCI 524 Group 8 Collaborative Software Development Project
MIT License
1 stars 2 forks source link

Initiate package review request #82

Closed ansarusc closed 3 years ago

cmmclaug commented 3 years ago

Dropping template here:

Submitting Author: Name (@github_handle)
Package Name: One-Line Description of Package: Repository Link:
Version submitted:
Editor: TBD
Reviewer 1: TBD
Reviewer 2: TBD
Archive: TBD
Version accepted: TBD


Description

Scope

* Please fill out a pre-submission inquiry before submitting a data visualization package. For more info, see notes on categories of our guidebook.

Technical checks

For details about the pyOpenSci packaging requirements, see our packaging guide. Confirm each of the following by checking the box. This package:

Publication options

JOSS Checks - [ ] The package has an **obvious research application** according to JOSS's definition in their [submission requirements][JossSubmissionRequirements]. Be aware that completing the pyOpenSci review process **does not** guarantee acceptance to JOSS. Be sure to read their submission requirements (linked above) if you are interested in submitting to JOSS. - [ ] The package is not a "minor utility" as defined by JOSS's [submission requirements][JossSubmissionRequirements]: "Minor ‘utility’ packages, including ‘thin’ API clients, are not acceptable." pyOpenSci welcomes these packages under "Data Retrieval", but JOSS has slightly different criteria. - [ ] The package contains a `paper.md` matching [JOSS's requirements][JossPaperRequirements] with a high-level description in the package root or in `inst/`. - [ ] The package is deposited in a long-term repository with the DOI: *Note: Do not submit your package separately to JOSS*

Are you OK with Reviewers Submitting Issues and/or pull requests to your Repo Directly?

This option will allow reviewers to open smaller issues that can then be linked to PR's rather than submitting a more dense text based review. It will also allow you to demonstrate addressing the issue via PR links.

Code of conduct

P.S. *Have feedback/comments about our review process? Leave a comment here

Editor and Review Templates

Editor and review templates can be found here

cmmclaug commented 3 years ago

Submitting Authors:

Package Name: aridanalysis One-Line Description of Package: DRY out your regression analysis! Repository Link: https://github.com/UBC-MDS/aridanalysis_py Version submitted: 0.4.0 Editor: Tiffany Timbers (@ttimbers) Reviewer 1: TBD
Reviewer 2: TBD
Archive: TBD
Version accepted: TBD


Description

As Data Scientists, being able to perform Exploratory Data Analysis as well as Regression Analysis are paramount to the process of analyzing trends in data. Moreover, following the DRY (Do Not Repeat Yourself) principle is regarded as a majority priority for maximizing code quality. Yet, often times Data Scientists facing these tasks will start the entire process from scratch, wasting both time and effort while compromising code quality. The aridanalysis package strives to remedy this problem by giving users an easy-to-implement EDA function alongside 3 robust statistical tests that will simplify these analytical processes and produce an easy to read interpretation of the input data. Users will no longer have to write many lines of code to explore their data effectively.

Scope

* Please fill out a pre-submission inquiry before submitting a data visualization package. For more info, see notes on categories of our guidebook.

Technical checks

For details about the pyOpenSci packaging requirements, see our packaging guide. Confirm each of the following by checking the box. This package:

Publication options

JOSS Checks - [ ] The package has an **obvious research application** according to JOSS's definition in their [submission requirements][JossSubmissionRequirements]. Be aware that completing the pyOpenSci review process **does not** guarantee acceptance to JOSS. Be sure to read their submission requirements (linked above) if you are interested in submitting to JOSS. - [ ] The package is not a "minor utility" as defined by JOSS's [submission requirements][JossSubmissionRequirements]: "Minor ‘utility’ packages, including ‘thin’ API clients, are not acceptable." pyOpenSci welcomes these packages under "Data Retrieval", but JOSS has slightly different criteria. - [ ] The package contains a `paper.md` matching [JOSS's requirements][JossPaperRequirements] with a high-level description in the package root or in `inst/`. - [ ] The package is deposited in a long-term repository with the DOI: *Note: Do not submit your package separately to JOSS*

Are you OK with Reviewers Submitting Issues and/or pull requests to your Repo Directly?

This option will allow reviewers to open smaller issues that can then be linked to PR's rather than submitting a more dense text based review. It will also allow you to demonstrate addressing the issue via PR links.

Code of conduct

P.S. *Have feedback/comments about our review process? Leave a comment here

Editor and Review Templates

Editor and review templates can be found here

danielon-5 commented 3 years ago

Looks great Craig. The only thing I would suggest would be the answers formatting from the point form questions below the SCOPE section.

cmmclaug commented 3 years ago

Request initiated: https://github.com/UBC-MDS/software-review-2021/issues/36