Closed aimee0317 closed 2 years ago
I find Andy's comment on the two README files valid. I think the .Rmd file could go. The downfall of not having an .Rmd is that bibliography is not automated anymore. However, .md
read well and is native to GitHub.
The other file that could be removed from the main directory is run_all.sh
now that we have a Makefile.
If we remove rmd file, how are we going to make it automated?
there is a README.md file already.
One feedback we have already worked on is making the image in the final report higher resolution. The commit was 3291034831fa877c13e70140c173ca194197bbd8
According to Jasmine's comment, we need to put specific contact email in the code of conduct. I will put my email address there. The commit no. is https://github.com/xiangwxt/canadian_heritage_funding/commit/07a0ed137aa9af08feefeb12fcdd0981d07bd766
According to Jasmine's comment, Analysis: "Therefore, we selected random forest as the best performing model to conduct hyperparameter optimization and tuned max_features, max_depth" and "class_weight as well as the max_features argument in CountVectorizer()." The issue has been revised, please see two commits below (there was a mistake in the first commit, and revised with the second one) https://github.com/xiangwxt/canadian_heritage_funding/commit/2d643b72ba13496e98a3a159d62df50e4f5185b2 https://github.com/xiangwxt/canadian_heritage_funding/commit/c6e87dcfbf691d8d6f13a9fe4ef2a04f8a91d767
TA Andy mentioned we need to add figure caption, I think we have already added in the rmd file, the thing is it could not be displayed on github_document.
We need to pick at least four feedback according to which we can make improvements on our project. Let's discuss!