UBC-MDS / coRPysprofiling

DSCI524-Group13 Package for EDA and EDV on text
GNU General Public License v3.0
0 stars 1 forks source link

Initiate package review request #49

Closed eboylestanley closed 3 years ago

ssyayayy commented 3 years ago

Draft

Submitting Author: Ivy Zhang (@ssyayayy), Anita Li (@AnitaLi-0371), Elanor Boyle-Stanley (@eboylestanley), Junghoo Kim (@jkim222383) Package Name: coRPysprofiling One-Line Description of Package: coRPysprofiling performs EDA and EDV on text Repository Link: https://github.com/UBC-MDS/coRPysprofiling/releases/tag/0.1.4 Version submitted: 0.1.4 Editor: Tiffany Timbers(@ttimbers ) Reviewer 1: TBD
Reviewer 2: TBD
Archive: TBD
Version accepted: TBD


Description

Scope

Technical checks

For details about the pyOpenSci packaging requirements, see our [packaging guide][PackagingGuide]. Confirm each of the following by checking the box. This package:

Publication options

JOSS Checks - [ ] The package has an **obvious research application** according to JOSS's definition in their [submission requirements][JossSubmissionRequirements]. Be aware that completing the pyOpenSci review process **does not** guarantee acceptance to JOSS. Be sure to read their submission requirements (linked above) if you are interested in submitting to JOSS. - [ ] The package is not a "minor utility" as defined by JOSS's [submission requirements][JossSubmissionRequirements]: "Minor ‘utility’ packages, including ‘thin’ API clients, are not acceptable." pyOpenSci welcomes these packages under "Data Retrieval", but JOSS has slightly different criteria. - [ ] The package contains a `paper.md` matching [JOSS's requirements][JossPaperRequirements] with a high-level description in the package root or in `inst/`. - [ ] The package is deposited in a long-term repository with the DOI: *Note: Do not submit your package separately to JOSS*

Are you OK with Reviewers Submitting Issues and/or pull requests to your Repo Directly?

This option will allow reviewers to open smaller issues that can then be linked to PR's rather than submitting a more dense text based review. It will also allow you to demonstrate addressing the issue via PR links.

Code of conduct

ssyayayy commented 3 years ago

Opened the request on software-review-2021 repository: https://github.com/UBC-MDS/software-review-2021/issues/38 Will close this issue.

ssyayayy commented 3 years ago

Update release version to 0.1.6 in the package review request.