Peer Feeback - Lara

[larahabashy]

Hi classmates, great effort on the project and neat selection of data! The project is very well done.

Here's my feedback:

• Documentation: Functions and code are very well-documented with comments throughout.

• Code: Easily readable and reproducible.

• Analysis and reasoning: Overall clear and sufficient analysis. Great flow of reasoning.

• Communication: I found some tiny typos in your report under Analysis. The words "initial" and "conjunction" are misspelt.
  I would also suggest making the size of the table "Cross-validation results for different classifiers" smaller.
  The improvements section is a great addition to your report!

• Suggestions: I would consider moving figures generated by running make all to results subfolder called figures, essentially splitting results into figures and a subfolder called predictions.
  I would also suggest keeping only one EDA file in src directory.
  I noticed the link referring to literal document in the README file does not link to the report in doc folder.

[IfyAnene7]

Thank you so much @larahabashy!!!