Peer Review Feedback for v0.2.0 release

[KangboLu]

The following feedback is based on the release v0.2.0.
If you have already updated your repo respecting some of my feedback in future versions> v0.2.0, feel free to ignore the corresponding feedback on v0.2.0.

• Documentation: Is the project properly documented? Yes, it is great.
• Code: The code is readable. One optional improvement would be: For download_data.csv, you can write some error handling code for downloading data. Our group was deducted points because we didn't do it, although it's not required in the written requirement.
• Analysis and reasoning: Is the analysis correct?
  Yes, it is great. One improvement would always include a baseline model for model comparison. No appearance of the baseline model is mentioned in your report. We don't know if the models perform better than without a complex model or not.
• Communication: Yes, it's easy to follow and the report communicates the findings effectively. Good job!

[mmyz88]

Thanks you @KangboLu for the insightful comments, they are really helpful! We will discuss among our group to decide whether we include the baseline model.