Decide calibration method to be included in the Slicelet

[tdowrick]

In GitLab by @DavidPerez-Suarez on Nov 23, 2018, 15:41

@JonathanShapey via email on Nov 20th.

I’ll meet up with Remi this week to discuss the calibration steps again but following yesterday’s testing I think it’s likely that we will use the Slicer-recommended tracked stylus method (at least in the first instance). It needs a bit more testing/tweaking but Remi has already managed to iron out a few of the issues we were having yesterday afternoon.

[tdowrick]

In GitLab by @RemiDelaunay on Nov 29, 2018, 13:10

I had good results with the tracked stylus method yesterday (see setup and results attached). Perhaps we don't need to add the image calibration method to the slicelet to keep it as simple as possible. The orientation of the image relative to the tip of the probe is fixed so we don't need to estimate a new transform every time (the pivot calibration is different because the marker attached to the probe don't have a fixed position).

[tdowrick]

In GitLab by @MattClarkson on Nov 30, 2018, 09:50

I'm loving the blue tac. What was the RMS error? How many points did you grab?

[tdowrick]

In GitLab by @JonathanShapey on Nov 30, 2018, 09:52

RMS error was 0.5

[tdowrick]

In GitLab by @JonathanShapey on Nov 30, 2018, 09:52

closed

[tdowrick]

In GitLab by @DavidPerez-Suarez on Dec 5, 2018, 16:38

reopened

[tdowrick]

In GitLab by @MattClarkson on Dec 14, 2018, 13:28

Is this not 'Done'? @DavidPerez-Suarez - why was it re-opened? Can discuss at meeting later.

[tdowrick]

In GitLab by @JonathanShapey on Dec 14, 2018, 16:50

I think this is done

[tdowrick]

In GitLab by @JonathanShapey on Dec 14, 2018, 16:51

closed