Open arnwinej opened 1 year ago
SMDL Link: https://sinaimanuscripts.library.ucla.edu/catalog/ark%3A%2F21198%2Fz1c26f2j
Description Document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11LNAueZ2U8CljkgC3DRlqeuIgBlf6CoG/edit
Outline: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B3C_BkOWkjO3WiqAdbiT_BJBNUJZp2MlIS6Bls6rPD0/edit#
Summary: A lectionary with relation to many other fragments at Mt. Sinai and in other repositories. Should the later addition on ff. 71-72 be considered secondary or a new codicological unit? These folia are also palimpsest.
Added a few comments here as well
wlpotter
commented
1 year ago
SMDL Link: https://sinaimanuscripts.library.ucla.edu/catalog/ark%3A%2F21198%2Fz1c26f2j
Description Document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11LNAueZ2U8CljkgC3DRlqeuIgBlf6CoG/edit
Outline: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B3C_BkOWkjO3WiqAdbiT_BJBNUJZp2MlIS6Bls6rPD0/edit#
Summary: A lectionary with relation to many other fragments at Mt. Sinai and in other repositories. Should the later addition on ff. 71-72 be considered secondary or a new codicological unit? These folia are also palimpsest.