Closed rcurrie closed 6 years ago
Sounds good to me.
@e-t-k Ok to merge? Or should I hold off till your done with your run, happy either way.
@rcurrie if you don't mind waiting until next week so i can have a chance to look at it that would be great. I'm swamped today with v6 stuff.
@e-t-k no problem, standing by.
I've modified the pipeline's Makefile and fabfile to only preserve the bam output from umend and use that for min-var-call. Updated umend and docker as well (see separate pull request). This means the the bam will live under umend at the end of a treeshop run. e-t-k - note my hack to delete the locally pulled rnaseq bam - expediant for the moment to make this a smaller set of code change. Doing it 'right' means possibly breaking the Makefile or re-structuring the way backhaul works...
I've run this on the TEST sample and it works both in Makefile and Treeshop