Open jamesallenevans opened 3 years ago
Intuitions: (1) + The words from subreddit Personal Finance corpus that are similar to word "finance" are different from words subreddit wallstreetbets that are similar to "finance" --when people talking about finance, they are talking different things (2) * Wallstreetbets corpus is different from Personal Finance corpus
Data: Posts from subreddit Personal Finance: Download Posts from subreddit Wallstreetbets: Download
Dataset: Twitter likes from profiles with personality labels. TAs please note: The data has not been cleaned for non-english profiles.
Intuitions: 1) (*) We would see the likes of users with high openness and low agreeableness (labelled 'intuitive', 'thinking' = 1) differ significantly in semantic content from those with the opposite traits ( 'intuitive', 'thinking' = 0).
2) (+) The semantic content of likes from the first set of users will align stronger with 'technology' and 'science' than the second set's. We would see a stronger alignment towards less abstract themes (think cooking, animals, sports?) for the second set of users.
Intuition: (1) * News articles are clustered by categories. (2) + Fake and real news articles have different linguistic features, and therefore will differentiable in the semantic space.
Dataset: This dataset is from Perez-Rosas et al. (2017) on fake news detection. It's a small dataset but it's marked for both authenticity and news category. Nevertheless, the fake news pieces are created by AMT, so it might read a bit off comparing to actual fake news. (https://data.world/romanticmonkey/perez-rosasfakenews)
Notes: label = 1 for fake news, label = 0 for real news
Intuitions
Dataset News on the Web (NOW) Davies corpus. There are at least 70,000 articles from 2010 to 2020 that include "artificial intelligence."
intuition: (1) * Issues in terms of Immigrants are more and more related to Economics and Security issues. (2) + Post and Pre 911 News have different topic intentions towards immigrants, refugees, and Specific Cultures
Dataset: COCA News
Intuition:
Dataset: Sothebys art entry
IntuitioIntuitions: *1. Feminism has always been the theme of Gilmore Girls.
Dataset: http://www.crazy-internet-people.com/site/gilmoregirls/scripts.html
Intuitions: I expect more romantic content in fanfiction than in source material.* I expect more positive word associations with marginalized groups in fanfiction than in source material.+
Data: Scraping data from Archive of Our Own (http://archiveofourown.org/) using this script (https://github.com/radiolarian/AO3Scraper), along with the Davies TV Corpus
Intuitions:
Dataset: web of science Econ journal article abstracts.
hypothesis: we can predict events of companies (e.g. IPO, growth, bankruptcy, CEO firing) by their glassdoor company reviews.
Data: Glassdoor company review data
People speaking about Latin American politicians that ran for president (2005-2015):
Corpus del Español: This corpus contains about two billion words of Spanish, taken from about two million web pages from 21 different Spanish-speaking countries. It was web-scraped in 2015.
Class dataset: Corpus del Español ("SPAN").
Subject: Topics and rhetoric change in the Marx-Engels Collected Works (MECW), 1835-1895 Intuitions:
(+) So-called "Late Marx" (esp. MECW Volumes 28-37) and "Young Marx" (esp. Volumes 1-5) have substantial similarity in topics and rhetoric, with perhaps some changes in vocabulary (*) The content of unpublished MECW materials (letters and poetry, see MECW 1-2, 38-50) differs significantly from published works Chapters in Capital Vols. I, II, and III are relatively idiosyncratic to each book, with topics more likely to belong within books than to cross books (MECW 35-37).
Data: Link to a scraped copy of the MECW, Vol 1-49 (386 mb, saved as a .csv.) Documents are saved in a single data table, organized by "document" number (i.e. volume number of the MECW) and "subdocument" (i.e. individual texts, letters, chapters, etc. published within each volume.) Data needs tokenization, mild cleaning, etc. Key to understanding what's in each volume can be accessed here.
Hypothesis: There are overlap topics between presidential speeches and executive orders and that overlap differs by the president.
Data: Presidential speeches corpus from https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches and Executive orders from https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders
Intuitions:
(+) In structured debates, the winning teams' arguments will be centered around the debate topic.
(*) Winners of different debates on a similar topic (like climate change) would be more closely aligned to each other than the losers.
I didn't collect the data on this because this is unrelated to my project, but it can be scraped from Munk Debates and Intelligence Squared websites.
Intuitions: (*) Republican presidents' rhetoric on energy policy will be more aligned with talking about jobs (so as to defend the coal industry), whereas Democratic presidents' rhetoric on energy policy will have more to do with climate change and the environment. (+) Language used in energy-related bills will be similar to language used in health-related bills. Corpus: Presidential speeches corpus from Miller Corpus Can be scraped with: this code Contact me at lilygrier@uchicago.edu if you want the corpus of executive orders!
First, write down two intuitions you have about broad content patterns you will discover in your data. These can be the same as those from last week...or they can evolve based on last week's explorations and the novel possibilities that emerge from continuous, high-dimensional embeddings. As before, place an asterisk next to the one you expect most firmly, and a plus next to the one that, if true, would be the biggest or most important surprise to others (especially the research community to whom you might communicate it, if robustly supported). Note that these expectations become the basis of abduction--to condition your surprise. Second, describe the dataset(s) on which you will build an embedding model to explore these intuitions. Then place (a) a link to the data, (b) a script to download and clean it, (c) a reference to a class dataset, (d) an invitation for a TA to contact you about it, OR (e) a brief explanation why the data cannot be made available. Please do NOT spend time/space explaining the precise embedding or analysis strategy you will use to explore your intuitions. (Then upvote the 5 most interesting, relevant and challenging challenge responses from others).