Closed smmaurer closed 4 years ago
Hey @smmaurer , Is there a way to not simplify the Pandana network from bbox. I mean when API is called the data is further narrowed to fewer nodes and edges.... I want the network with every node and edges, possible?
Hi @thinkersloo ! I think you are referring to the OSMnet package here: https://github.com/UDST/osmnet that generates the network. If you want to open up a issue on OSMnet with an example of a small network that is missing nodes/edges with an example of the same network that has the missing nodes/edges we can take a look at it to reproduce. Pointing out which nodes/edges are missing in the example would be helpful.
Hi @thinkersloo ! I think you are referring to the OSMnet package here: https://github.com/UDST/osmnet that generates the network. If you want to open up a issue on OSMnet with an example of a small network that is missing nodes/edges with an example of the same network that has the missing nodes/edges we can take a look at it to reproduce. Pointing out which nodes/edges are missing in the example would be helpful.
Hi @sablanchard ,
I have already opened an issue about 2 weeks ago. It will be very grateful if you provide me some resolution.
Thanks!
This issue is to plan the v0.5 release of Pandana.
Previously merged PR's
These PR's have been merged subsequent to v0.4.4, and will be included in this release:
Additional things to include
Anything else to include?
I believe
network.plot()
is pretty broken at the moment, because it relies on an old Matplotlib extension called Basemap that’s now deprecated and hard to install (see issue #110). But I think it's better to get the existing updates released right now, and put that off until later.