search

UGS-GIO / Website

UGS Website
0 stars 0 forks source link

Water Quality Protection #55

Closed Mackenzie-Cope closed 3 years ago

Mackenzie-Cope commented 4 years ago

Needs images/figures/etc. - done

Mackenzie-Cope commented 3 years ago

@marshallrobinson

marshallrobinson commented 3 years ago
Mackenzie-Cope commented 3 years ago

Fixed.

Mackenzie-Cope commented 3 years ago

@mikehylland

mikehylland commented 3 years ago

  1. Under Contamination, "Inorganic Chemicals" window, second paragraph ("Metals"), last sentence: Insert space between "10" and "µg/L." HOWEVER:

  2. Seems to me that perhaps the "Inorganic Chemicals" and "Organic Chemicals" sections get a little too far into the weeds. Do we really want to be presenting specific data for specific locales, or do we want to keep the web page info at a high level and simply give overviews of the issues? If we do want to highlight some examples, we could keep things very general. For example, the Millard County arsenic issue could be stated along the lines of, "In Millard County, high concentrations of arsenic in groundwater have been attributed to volcanic rocks in valley-fill deposits that form the drinking water aquifer." The paragraphs on mining-related contamination and Hill AFB could be similarly generalized/shortened. I think the content of the "Common Wetland Stressors" on the [Wetlands] Health & Restoration page provides a good model for the overall content of these contaminant sections. Maybe worth some additional discussion with Janae and Hugh?

  3. Under "Pollution," sentence introducing bullet list: Suggest changing "Some of the significant other nonpoint sources..." to "Other significant nonpoint sources..." "Significant other" sounds kinda funny. ;)

  4. Everything else looks great!

Mackenzie-Cope commented 3 years ago

All comments addressed except for comment 2. Sent to Hugh for his opinion.