BUG: [Give the Bug a Name]

[wetlandsDiane]

What happened?

When you turn on the Wetland Condition group and view the Wetland Assessment Project feature, you can't really see the SV URAP and GSL URAP polygon layers. Can you change the transparency so that the polygons are at least somewhat visible?

You can just see the edge of the SV URAP project peaking out in Nevada and you can't see the GSL URAP boundary at all, though if you click around where the Great Salt Lake is, you can see the layer show up.

What did you expect to happen?

I expect to be able to see all of the features in the feature class

Browser Version

Chrome

[wetlandsDiane]

If you have to just show the outline for each project instead of having it colored in, that would be okay as long as we can see the different projects

[marthajensen]

@wetlandsDiane I changed the transparency from 30% to 50%. Have a look and see if that's what you want or if I should make the layer more transparent

[marshallrobinson]

I'm not sure if I'm not seeing the updated version yet, but I can't see those polygons yet. Is it possible to draw the SV URAP and GSL URAP polygons on top? If so: Diane, would you like it that way or does that cover too much of the underlying polygons?

[marthajensen]

Ya don't look yet! woops - I had an underlying layer turned on... I'm republishing- I'll let you know when its done

[marthajensen]

@jjhi11 we might need to figure out what's going on together. In Pro and in the published feature service (when added back to Pro), I can see the symbology correctly, however, it isn't displaying how I have it symbolized in the wetlands app. This is the feature service, added back to Pro (how I think its supposed to look):

but this is how it looks in the app:

[wetlandsDiane]

It looks much better in the app, thanks!

One thing of note though- the color for the Central Basin looks almost the same as the color of the map. Is there a different color that could be used?

The features may also look better with outlines and if they were slightly less transparent.

thanks

On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 2:12 PM Jay Hill @.***> wrote:

Closed #59 https://github.com/UGS-GIO/wetlands/issues/59 as completed via 921cdb8 https://github.com/UGS-GIO/wetlands/commit/921cdb85bc7b7308a794364c1c8fa730cb3fdd96 .

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/UGS-GIO/wetlands/issues/59#event-7726921821, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE3KRTWUHCLGOWR4TGA3IPDWGLDMBANCNFSM6AAAAAARTQ4BQY . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

-- Diane Menuz Wetland Program Coordinator Utah Geological Survey 1594 W. North Temple P.O. Box 146100 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 801.538.7436 http://geology.utah.gov/resources/wetlands/

[jjhi11]

@wetlandsDiane I made the central basin poly a bit more opaque. check it out and let me know. i can play around with outlines later today

[wetlandsDiane]

That is definitely better, thanks! I think it would be even better if it were green or something, but I am fine with it that color with the darker opacity.

thanks

On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 6:53 AM Jay Hill @.***> wrote:

@wetlandsDiane https://github.com/wetlandsDiane I made the central basin poly a bit more opaque. check it out and let me know. i can play around with outlines later today

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/UGS-GIO/wetlands/issues/59#issuecomment-1302053027, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE3KRTQEH6ACM5LGCAHRLKLWGOYTLANCNFSM6AAAAAARTQ4BQY . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

-- Diane Menuz Wetland Program Coordinator Utah Geological Survey 1594 W. North Temple P.O. Box 146100 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 801.538.7436 http://geology.utah.gov/resources/wetlands/