UKHackspaceFoundation / foundation

UK Hackspace Foundation documentation.
Other
6 stars 3 forks source link

Membership management / MRM / CRM solutions #43

Open idnorton opened 7 years ago

idnorton commented 7 years ago

I thought we had an issue for this but apparently not.

Customer Relationship Management (CRM) / Member Relationship Management (MRM) systems are diverse and contentious. Some spaces write their own whilst others try and adopt solutions to fit their needs.

This is a common need for all hackspaces so we should have a section for discussion of it.

idnorton commented 7 years ago

Extensive discussion has already happened on discourse for this over at UK Hackspace Foundation Forum

unknowndomain commented 7 years ago

Features:

Axford commented 7 years ago

In addition (stuff that the swindon system does):

Future enhancements / nice to haves:

amunizp commented 7 years ago

Could we have links to the different solutions that exist onbdifferent hackspaces? We can later generate a table to compare requirements and TRL.

idnorton commented 7 years ago

Has anybody done the prep work for the legal side on this yet?

Given GDPR coming in next year, there's much greater compliance requirements than the existing DPA. Not sure if I should create a new thread for that discussion? Would like to be able to crib that if anyone has it as that's definitely the starting point for the then technical implementation discussion.

Currently working with someone to try and implement CiviCRM and associated documentation with some use cases but it's not going to happen as quickly as we'd like :/

Ian.

unknowndomain commented 7 years ago

I truly have no idea what the GDPR wants of us because it's so huge and overwhelming.

Kind Regards

Tom Lynch Sent from my iPhone

On 23 Aug 2017, at 09:32, Ian Norton notifications@github.com wrote:

Has anybody done the prep work for the legal side on this yet?

Given GDPR coming in next year, there's much greater compliance requirements than the existing DPA. Not sure if I should create a new thread for that discussion? Would like to be able to crib that if anyone has it as that's definitely the starting point for the then technical implementation discussion.

Currently working with someone to try and implement CiviCRM and associated documentation with some use cases but it's not going to happen as quickly as we'd like :/

Ian.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

amunizp commented 7 years ago

Currently working with someone to try and implement CiviCRM and associated documentation with some use cases but it's not going to happen as quickly as we'd like :/

Is this the person you are working with?

Git hub handle @michaelmcandrew Looks like the same person.

michaelmcandrew commented 7 years ago

hey there, i am @michaelmcandrew (as you may have guessed) but am not working with you guys on civicrm. would be happy to try and help though. I could certainly help with answering any civicrm questions you have and would be happy to help out people that want to implement civicrm at their hackspace (and/or evaluate if civicrm would be a good fit for them).

FWIW, here is some info on civicrm and GDPR http://itforcharities.co.uk/VedaNFPConsultingLTDGDPRV1.2.pdf

gcarreno commented 6 years ago

Hello all,

I'm the one that is working with @idnorton towards an easily (enough) solution to get a Drupal & CiviCRM (with containers, MAYBE...) Installation with defaults that are useful for the UK spaces context.

Like Ian said, still very early stages of getting ansible scripts ironed out and in some cases, assessing if even useful.

Ian sent me the link to this issue and I'm a member of the Lancaster and Morecambe Makers(LAMM) space.

Hope I'm not intruding too much by posting 😃

Cheers, Gus

amunizp commented 6 years ago

Thank you @gcarreno not intruding at all thank you for coming. If the project is being hosted somewhere, could you link to it?

Thank you @michaelmcandrew for stopping by.

I guess we could focus this issue with a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) decided by user-centric design for our solution and selecting a number of Personae and doing a validation of their desires and empathies.

The types of Personae I propose are:

proffalken commented 11 months ago

Since 2017, there has also been the emergence of https://github.com/membermatters/MemberMatters providing billing via stripe, integration with SpaceAPI.io, physical/tool access via maglogs and RFID readers, and a few other things.

This is still a hot topic of conversation on the Telegram group and could probably do with a clear-steer from UKHSF, even if that's "We have a list of prefered ones, but feel free to write your own"

proffalken commented 11 months ago

@idnorton / @gcarreno / @amunizp - did the CiviCRM stuff go anywhere? Is it worth using, or should we just be saying "here's a list of things people are already using, pick one and see how you get on?"

gcarreno commented 11 months ago

Hey Matthew (@proffalken),

The CiviCRM did go somewhere. But it's been quite a while since I've been involved with the project, or even gone to my hackspace, that I completely forget the details.

Maybe Ian (@idnorton) is the better person to answer this since he was a lot more invested into it.

Cheers, Gus

proffalken commented 11 months ago

Thanks @gcarreno , appreciate your time to answer this!

gcarreno commented 11 months ago

Hey Matthew(@proffalken),

More than welcome!!

Cheers, Gus

amunizp commented 9 months ago

I guess it might be worth adding a bit of a checklist of the systems that currently exist that meet certain standards/criteria?

For example:

proffalken commented 9 months ago

@amunizp - great idea! Is that something you might be able to look at, or shall we ask on the organisers' telegram chat?

amunizp commented 9 months ago

I think we should bikeshed this in the owners manual chat. I'll start with a proposal and look for consensus.

Proposal:

Simplify what was mentioned in https://github.com/UKHackspaceFoundation/foundation/issues/43#issuecomment-288753742 and in https://github.com/UKHackspaceFoundation/foundation/issues/43#issuecomment-288429280 as much as possible.

For a CRM to be listed by Hackspace Foundation it should have as many of following features:

This table will contain a list of proposed systems that you can use at your own risk.

Features

Clarifying questions:

No. That would be an ideal scenario.

Like a classic Wikipedia comparison table. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_CRM_systems

List of choices.

Owner Manual is always just a recommendation. Evidently if admins of a certain space purposely use a system that harms anybody in any way it will be a clear indicator that their intentions are not within the spirit of UKHSF.

This should not be seen any more binding than opening a travel magazine that states "Top 5 beaches in Cornwall".

Objections & Counter proposals

Even if you do believe there should be one recommended option only, this can be a way to find out.

proffalken commented 9 months ago

Love it! Especially the last comment :rofl:

idnorton commented 9 months ago

We should find the one system that all hackspaces contribute to and recommend that.

I strongly disagree with this. We should present different options with the details and possible pros and cons for people to make their own informed decisions. Specific uses should be in case studies for people to see how those panned out for individual organisations.

chris18890 commented 9 months ago

Re features & bikeshedding, this may be of use as a starting point - https://wiki.hackerspaces.org/Hackerspace_Software

amunizp commented 8 months ago

Proposal was consented by several members of the telegram chat (5).

We agreed to upload to drive.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sgf3-2HtiPM7vMdyNAZbP0YhzgYRfBE_mIoxtXSimE4/edit?usp=drivesdk

  1. book of formalisation.