SEGAS-00003 should explicitly require naming SRO

[GraemeSutherlandHO]

We welcome feedback on all of the content on the site. Please let us know what you think we could change or improve below

Which content do you think should be reviewed? SEGAS-00003 https://engineering.homeoffice.gov.uk/standards/minimal-documentation-set-for-a-product/

Why do you think we should review this? In minimal documentation, is useful to mention who is the senior responsible owner (SRO) for a product.

Do you have a suggestion for how this could be improved? In minimal documentation, is useful to mention who is the senior responsible owner (SRO) for a product. This could be recommended or required.

Additional information

Please confirm the below

• [x ] I have checked through the issues on the repository and don't think this has already been suggested

[robertdeniszczyc2]

Would SRO be included under "key stakeholders" which is already called out, or should SRO have its own line item?

[edhamiltonHO]

I had the same thought, and wondered if there where any other specific, and common, stakeholders we might want to specify?

I think if we have multiple along lines of the above then a nested list under key stakeholders would be good. If not, then an additional line, or incorporation into the existing line - e.g. 'including the Senior Responsible Owner (SRO)', even if that is a little clunky

[GraemeSutherlandHO]

SRO is a bit more important than a stakeholder. I'd list SRO separately.

Useful reference: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-role-of-the-senior-responsible-owner/the-role-of-the-senior-responsible-owner

[robertdeniszczyc2]

SRO is a bit more important than a stakeholder. I'd list SRO separately.

Useful reference: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-role-of-the-senior-responsible-owner/the-role-of-the-senior-responsible-owner

That's a useful link, we can link to that