Closed piyanatk closed 4 years ago
@piyanatk I have not tested this myself, I've only run the code on the 144 antenna example supplied in the example. And a 36 hexagon, but I did not do speed comparisons
According to Jon, BLAS is not being used in the current C codes.
I'll put it on do list.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 18:52 Piyanat (Boom) Kittiwisit < notifications@github.com> wrote:
According to Jon, BLAS is not being used in the current C codes.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/UKZN-Astronomy/corrcal/issues/14?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADDW4VL64JMUISGZCQYBYOTQX7CNVA5CNFSM4JAYTFYKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEGP6G5A#issuecomment-564126580, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADDW4VLWCXZUFXPF6C524HTQX7CNVANCNFSM4JAYTFYA .
Dropping this issue since blas has not been implemented in the current code.
Originally posted by @ronniyjoseph in #5 (comment)
@sievers' arXiv pre-print discusses how c-code actually slows corrcal down for small problems:
@Mdlalose, @Zahra-Kader, @ronniyjoseph Have you run tests to confirm this? If not, we should put it in a to do list.