Open piyanatk opened 4 years ago
Shouldn't it do better than redundant calibration, since it's also using some sky info? Or is it just redundant because there's no foreground sources?
Yes, just redundant, no foreground sources.
I should probably think more about which tests to be done before opening more issues. I will get in touch with everyone on slack.
I am just a bit confused, is this to see whether calibration imprints a signature on the 21 cm signal?
Because calibration is performed on foreground as sources, because at the integration time steps of observations the EoR signal is orders of magnitude smaller than both the foregrounds and thermal noise.
@ronniyjoseph This is just to check how corrcal perform with a perfectly redundant array, so same beam for each antenna, exact position, no sky information.
I should edit the first post.
Perfect Redundancy Test
Motivation
corrcal should behave like redundant calibration on a perfectly redundant array with no sky information.
Test Components