SWC branding on workshop website.

[bsmith89]

I put a little effort into swapping out the branding (see the umswc-branding branch on this repo), but I was unsuccessful.

Is keeping the SWC branding a bad idea, since this is not an official workshop?

[celticelk]

I think that it's technically in violation of our membership terms, if the workshop doesn't adhere to SWC's curriculum.

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Byron Smith notifications@github.com wrote:

I put a little effort into swapping out the branding (see the umswc-branding https://github.com/UMSWC/2016-12-14-umich/tree/umswc-branding branch on this repo), but I was unsuccessful.

Is keeping the SWC branding a bad idea, since this is not an official workshop?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/UMSWC/2016-12-14-umich/issues/3, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMOPUidpEhvaqQSdjHhB_vG98WHYvyc6ks5rDIEygaJpZM4K_ZX5 .

-- Scott Martin Biological Sciences Librarian Shapiro Science Library University of Michigan 734.764.8196 / samarti@umich.edu @ScottMLibrary ORCID: 0000-0002-9925-4603

[bsmith89]

Yep, that's what I thought.

I don't think I have the time to deal with that in the next few days, since I'm still unsure what exactly that will entail.

If neither of you want to take it on, maybe we can recruit @pschloss ?

[bsmith89]

I also reworded the introductory paragraph in a3b46f1e. Could someone check that the new language is appropriate?

[aerenchyma]

I don't really feel comfortable w/ any strong opinion on this since it seems you all know better, but happy with whatever is decided.

[bsmith89]

I'm ready to merge #8 and close this issue. Thoughts?