Open aohsato opened 1 year ago
Dear authors,
Thanks for the great package and algorithms. We're currently using the repository forked from here for LiDAR-Camera calibration. (This is @knzo25 's work, we discuss syncing with your upstream in https://github.com/UMich-BipedLab/LiDARTag/issues/15)
About the License, LiDARTag_msgs is using AGPL but should our code that includes it also be AGPL? https://github.com/UMich-BipedLab/LiDARTag_msgs/blob/release_v1/LICENSE
For example, we include it in https://github.com/tier4/CalibrationTools/blob/tier4/universe/sensor/extrinsic_tag_based_calibrator/include/extrinsic_tag_based_ calibrator/extrinsic_tag_based_calibrator.hpp#L29
Our understanding is that it does not need to be AGPL, but do you have same opinion? We'd like to know your intentions.
Thanks!
Additionally, the LICENSE file says AGPL, but package.xml says BSD. Which is correct?
LICENSE
package.xml
Dear authors,
Thanks for the great package and algorithms. We're currently using the repository forked from here for LiDAR-Camera calibration. (This is @knzo25 's work, we discuss syncing with your upstream in https://github.com/UMich-BipedLab/LiDARTag/issues/15)
About the License, LiDARTag_msgs is using AGPL but should our code that includes it also be AGPL? https://github.com/UMich-BipedLab/LiDARTag_msgs/blob/release_v1/LICENSE
For example, we include it in https://github.com/tier4/CalibrationTools/blob/tier4/universe/sensor/extrinsic_tag_based_calibrator/include/extrinsic_tag_based_ calibrator/extrinsic_tag_based_calibrator.hpp#L29
Our understanding is that it does not need to be AGPL, but do you have same opinion? We'd like to know your intentions.
Thanks!