Taxonomy Merge

[jmatsushita]

Continuing from http://atrium.wiredcraft.com/internews/node/4813 CC @guillaumev @meeles

Hi Kurt,

Could you change the D7 features:

1. Modify Message content type in the Feature to use the HR.info Population Type vocabulary: a. for the Target Audience field (keeping it's actual name) [Don't do this field only At risk groups] b. for the At Risk Group field (also keeping it's name)
2. Implement an import hook that does the following: a. Prevent the import of the following terms (full taxonomy copied further below for reference) :
   • All Children under 18
   • All Women
   • All Vulnerable Groups b. Remap Messages that have been assigned to any of those 3 terms to their parent terms (i.e.)
   • All Children under 18 -> Children
   • All Women -> Women
   • All Vulnerable Groups -> Vulnerable Groups

Let me know if that's clear!

Best,

Jun  

Taxonomy

• 'All' becomes 'All affected population' [if you could rename your "All" term it would work best in the context of your other terms such as "Other affected population"].
• Children [new term, parent of the other Children terms below].
  • Adolescents [new term]
  • 'All children under 18' becomes Children [the D6 category will stay, but in D7 this will be remapped to the parent category Children].
  • Babies [new term]
  • Boys [new term]
  • Children under 5 [no change]
  • Disabled children [new term]
  • Girls [new term]
• Conflict affected [for coherence would you consider changing becomes "Conflict affected population"? The Message Library does not have this term at the moment so it would work either way]
• Displaced Populations [new term to group displacement related terms]
  • Camp population [new term, unfortunately cannot be merged with neither IDPs or Refugees as we're talking about people residing in camps which might be both, and some IDPs might be hosted by the local population].
  • Refugees [no change]
  • Repatriated [no change]
  • Returnees [no change]
  • IDPs [no change]
• Families who have lost primary caregiver [new term]
• Host communities [no change]
• Men [no change]
• Other [no change]
• Other affected population [no change]
• Pastoralists [new term]
• Teachers [new term]
• Vulnerable groups [new term]
  • All vulnerable groups
  • Older people
  • People living with HIV
  • People with disabilities
  • Transexuals/Transgenders [new term]
• Women [no change]
  • All Women
  • HIV+ pregnant women [new term]
  • Lactating women [new term]
  • Mothers becomes 'All Women' [new term]
  • Post partum women (up to 6 weeks) [new term]
  • Pregnant women [new term]

[jmatsushita]

Hi @guillaumev,

As discussed in the Wiredcraft Atrium issue referenced above, could you please implement the taxonomy changes to http://terms.humanitarianresponse.info so that we can remap our At Risk Groups and Target Audiences to your "Population Types" vocabulary?

Very best,

Jun

[meeles]

Hi, Just to let you know that I have changed the term 'vulnerable groups' to 'marginalised groups'. @kurtzhong I also went and changed the incorrect terms in D7 using the management links. However, I did not delete 'All children under 18' as there were 90 messages attached. Also, the drop down menu for 'at risk groups is not synchronised with the changes I have made in content manage management. Not sure if this should be recorded as a separate bug.

[guillaumev]

@all this is done, and I've checked that the terms were synchronized with the HR sites. I've also changed "vulnerable groups" to "marginalised groups", but this hasn't been synchronized yet. Cheers,

[sn00011]

@guillaumev, is this ticket finished already?

[jmatsushita]

@kurtzhong No. Guillaume only took care of his part #issuecomment-19927621 while the original request #20 is waiting for your action.

[sn00011]

Where can i get the lastest 'Population Types' terms? Now i only have this.

[meeles]

The terms are listed above under Taxonomy title. Additional terms include:

• sexually active men and boys
• sexually active women and girls
• family members

[sn00011]

So now the population types taxonomy is like this?

- All affected population
- Children -|
            |`- Adolescents
            |`- Babies         
            |`- Boys         
            |`- Children under 5          
            |`- Disabled children
             `- Girls 
- Conflict affected
- Displaced Populations -|
                         |`- Camp population
                         |`- Refugees
                         |`- Repatriated
                         |`- Returnees
                          `- IDPs                              
- Families who have lost primary caregiverOther
- Host communities
- Men
- Other
- Other affected population
- Pastoralists
- Teachers
- Marginalised Groups - |
                        |`- All vulnerable groups
                        |`- Older people
                        |`- People living with HIV
                        |`- People with disabilities
                         `- Transexuals/Transgenders
- Women - |
          |`- All Women
          |`- HIV+ pregnant women
          |`- Lactating women
          |`- Post partum women (up to 6 weeks)
           `- Pregnant women
- Sexually active men and boys
- Sexually active women and girls
- Family members

[meeles]

Hi Kurt, i've edited the list above vulnerable groups is now marginalised groups. NB Please see Jun's comment (copied and paste below) about differences between D6 and D7 version. b. Remap Messages that have been assigned to any of those 3 terms to their parent terms (i.e.)

• All Children under 18 -> Children
• All Women -> Women
• All marginalised Groups -> Marginalised Groups

[jmatsushita]

@kurtzhong @guillaumev Just thought that since the new taxonomy is now implemented on http://terms.humanitarianresponse.info/ for Population Type, that our previous Message Library Importer is not what we need to modify to do the remapping between D6 and D7, isn't it?

http://terms.humanitarianresponse.info/population-types.csv

@guillaumev Do you have a recommendation on whether we should modify the HRI importers or if it still makes sense to do the import with the ML importers?

[sn00011]

Not sure whether this is the newest At Risk Group taxonomy on infoasaid.org, some of my question below are based on this term list.

---

• Affected population
• Host Communities
• Camp population
• Children
  • All children under 18
  • Babies
  • Children under 5
  • Adolescents
  • Girls
  • Boys
  • Disabled children
• Vulnerable groups
• Older people
• HIV+ people
• Women
  • Pregnant women
  • Lactating women
  • Post partum women (up to 6 weeks)
  • HIV+ pregnant women
  • Mothers
• Men
• Families who have lost primary caregiver
• Pastoralists
• Sexually active groups
• Teachers

---

Here are the rules i am aware:

1. All children under 18 from infoasaid.org mapped to Children
2. All Women mapped to Women
3. All Vulnerable Groups mapped to Marginalised Groups

---

Some little questions:

1. Why the All Women (infoasaid.org) will be mapped to Women (on hr platform) rather that the term All Women_(on hr platform)_ under it?
2. Why the All children under 18 (infoasaid.org) will be mapped to Children (on hr platform) rather that the All children under 18 (on hr platform)?
3. Affected population from infoasaid.org will be mapped to?
4. Vulnerable groups from infoasaid.org mapped to?
5. HIV+ people from infoasaid.org mapped to?
6. Mothers from infoasaid.org mapped to?
7. Sexually active groups from infoasaid.org mapped to?

[sn00011]

@jmatsushita , any simple steps to get the Population Types terms set up right on my development evironment? I am using a copy of the hri.infoasaid.org and the Population Types looks like this.

[sn00011]

@jmatsushita, i think we need to to modify the importer. Do you have an alternative place to suggest?

[sn00011]

Sorry i didn't realize there was a feeds importer for the Population Types, now the vocabulary on my local is synchronized.

[sn00011]

@jmatsushita: Now we are using the Population Types, should we drop the At risk groups vocabulary from HR platform?

[meeles]

Hi Kurt, please keep 'At risk group' as a term or heading as this is well understood by users and is more descriptive than 'Population Types'.

[sn00011]

Just pushed some fixes for this. Please review.

[jmatsushita]

Seems to work. Closing.