Some of common themes from GSBPM feedback

[InKyungChoi]

• Make more relevant for non-survey data (e.g., administrative data, register, big data) (Uruguay, New Zealand, Sweden, Norway, UK, Belarus, Italy, Mexico, Canada, France)
• Better integration with GAMSO, clarification about its relationship to GAMSO (Romania, UK, Belarus, Italy, Mexico)
• Geospatial-related activities (Saudi Arabia, Portugal, France)
• Overaching process-related (e.g., add a new OP, make more visible, describe better) (Sweden, Belarus, Mexico, France)
• Strengthen data integration part (UK, Canada)
• Reflect diverse users, add user or respondent related activities (New Zealand, Portugal)

[InKyungChoi]

(from meeting #6 March 7th 2023): “Not to lose statistical edge of the models and not to over-generalise” (the models are meant for statistical organisations)

[InKyungChoi]

Communication with CBS Israel (15th August): I will gather up the material/practices/ideas that we have at ICBS on data ethics for different processes of GSBPM and translate into English. We will be happy to contribute in any other ways that you may need. Will be in touch.

[Chris-ECE]

Themes in the feedback received:

• Numbering of phases/subprocesses and nonlinearity of the model
• Managing relationships with respondents and identifying respondents' needs
• Incorporating methodology management into GSBPM (from GAMSO?)
• Data integration
• Renaming the Collect phase
• Linked Open Data
• Quality management - Into Overarching or GAMSO?
• Integration with GSIM or other models (Record Linkage Model, SDMX), Identification of subprocess inputs and outputs, relationship between activities and processes.
• Definition of units
• Archiving