search

UNECE / GSIMRevision

1 stars 1 forks source link

Review categorization of GSIM classes #8

Open InKyungChoi opened 2 years ago

InKyungChoi commented 2 years ago

GSIM classes (formerly called "information objects") can be grouped not just by the usual "Group" (e.g., Business Group, Concept Group), but also other ways (e.g., instance, conceptual; process-related, actor-related).

Do we need additional ways of grouping / categorising GSIM classes?

JALinnerud commented 2 years ago

Run time and design time might need an explanation

FlavioRizzolo commented 1 year ago

From Hungary (issue https://github.com/UNECE/GSIMRevision/issues/14)

What is the relationship of GSIM classes to architecture domains? What is the role of the current groups (base, business, exchange, stucture, concept)? Why is it this devision and not some other? What is it used for?