Write paper

[petebachant]

• [ ] Case description (see #12)
• [ ] Verification and solver settings selection
• [x] Foil data comparison
• [ ] Background on the Sheldahl data
• [x] Perf curves with Sheldahl data and LB DS model
• [x] Perf curves with BV model?
• [x] Perf curves with DS model disabled?
• [ ] Perf curves with XFOIL data?
• [x] Simulate perf Re dep? -- much sharper dropoff at low Re, where Sheldahl data is questionable
• [ ] Conclusions -- CACTUS works as well or better than ALM. Dynamic stall modeling seems to be the culprit, but hard to say without high quality static foil data at lower Re.

Going to somehow write this as a Word doc but link the figures so they can be updated automatically. Probably will not commit the report to this repo. Might use Pandoc and write as Markdown first, but we'll see.

Future work

• Investigate LB DS model critical normal force coefficients? Why not compute these automatically? Could compare with turbinesFoam
• Find more foil data at moderate Reynolds number
• Blade-resolved CFD

[petebachant]

Thinking of starting this as Markdown (so it can be viewed on the web) and converting to Word or LaTeX later for submission.

[petebachant]

Started this in Markdown on the paper branch: https://github.com/UNH-CORE/RM2-CACTUS/blob/paper/paper.md