Open petebachant opened 9 years ago
Also note that the meshing belt would be more tolerant to deviations in carriage height along the travel than a rack/pinion, since the idler pulleys could be mounted on vertical linear bearings with springs and gravity to hold them down.
The lower belt half could also be made from, e.g., machined plastic, which could be screwed down to the existing aluminum C-channels, rather than using a bonded belt section.
One regret I have is going with such a long belt drive for the tow system, which makes it hard to tune for oscillatory loads (though quite a bit better than the old wire rope). We could design something like below (from Bell-Everman, inc.), which would require mounting the motor and drive on the carriage. The belt on there right now is an ATL20, which is not symmetrical about its neutral axis, meaning a different belt would need to be used to mesh with it, or we'd have to switch to a symmetrical belt, which would mean new pulleys. This could be an expensive upgrade, but may be worth it if there is a consistent need for high oscillatory loading around the belt's resonant frequency.