Train, evaluate, and test are currently jumbled around into a bunch of different if statements. This could definitely be sorted properly as the original reason for doing this was how the simulated and real datasets were partially merged with the remaining split for the evaluation mode. Maybe a function that just takes in the two datasets and splits it accordingly between training and evaluation would be useful.
Train, evaluate, and test are currently jumbled around into a bunch of different if statements. This could definitely be sorted properly as the original reason for doing this was how the simulated and real datasets were partially merged with the remaining split for the evaluation mode. Maybe a function that just takes in the two datasets and splits it accordingly between training and evaluation would be useful.