Closed j08lue closed 3 months ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 12b74c715e3c8e7f09c0812bd0e7fd693c59f72f |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/ghg-demo/deploys/660d5a2f382fe400088d4112 |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-317--ghg-demo.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
I finished adding the layer thumbnails @j08lue . I didn't update the NOAA + methane ones as they don't load on E&A. Could revisit if needed 👍
I didn't update the NOAA + methane ones as they don't load on E&A
Yes, we do not need layer thumbnails for those for now. We can add them later, if need arises.
We will need the structured data, though, please, @siddharth0248, so we can use it in new designs of the Dataset cards in the Data Catalog (https://github.com/US-GHG-Center/ghgc-architecture/issues/133).
@faustoperez @j08lue I have updated the mdx for all the required files and updated the checkbox list
I'd like to take a look once everything is in the E&A environment
I merged the latest changes here into the preview at https://github.com/US-GHG-Center/veda-config-ghg/pull/319 - please check it out here: https://deploy-preview-319--ghg-demo.netlify.app/exploration
@j08lue When you click on an info button for a dataset layer, I think it would be more useful to see the temporal resolution on the top line as opposed to the latency. (e.g. in this example "monthly" rather than "approximately 2 years" - what do you think? Was there a justification for choosing latency to go in this position?
I think it would be more useful to see the temporal resolution on the top line as opposed to the latency
You are right. Sorry that I did not catch that earlier myself. This goes for the dataset card as well as the info page.
Let us please replace this in all the files here - latency
-> temporalResolution
- and I will make sure it gets updated in VEDA UI as well
Let us please replace this in all the files here
Done in the above commit. https://github.com/US-GHG-Center/veda-config-ghg/pull/317/commits/d54faf2b28710cefffb3c197697b32d6fb759dab
I made the changes we discussed, @Jeanne-le-Roux and @siddharth0248:
source
, spatialExtent
, temporalResolution
, unit
Can you give it one more look in this preview, please, @Jeanne-le-Roux, and confirm that it is ready to go out (when we launch E&A)?
@j08lue I think this looks good. One more thing - right now the unique layer descriptions are only displayed when you are presented with layers to select, but when you click on the info button for a layer in the explore environment that short layer description doesn't seem to be there. This is something that we need to make sure is visible somewhere.
Thanks, @Jeanne-le-Roux, I'll merge this PR then, to avoid more merge conflicts. Since the changes are backwards-compatible, there should be no issue in merging them already now, before the release of E&A.
I ticketed your suggestion for adding the layer description to the info modal - should be a quick fix.
Closes #303
infoDescription
blocks for each datasetinfo
blocks for each layermedia
blocks for each layerStructured info (info description)
Structured info (info blocks for each layer)
- [ ] noaa-cpfp-ch4-point- [ ] noaa-cpfp-co2-point- [ ] emit-ch4plume-v1Thumbnails
- [ ] noaa-cpfp-ch4-point- [ ] noaa-cpfp-co2-point- [ ] emit-ch4plume-v1