Closed reblake closed 4 years ago
I can see that the package is on active development now. I will change that! Regarding the second point, I don't agree. The rslurm::slurm_apply
does not receive either a list or a vector as argument. It is somewhat similar to apply
with the difference that apply
is made for arrays, not data.frames. slurmR
has Slurm_lapply
, Slurm_sapply
, and Slurm_Map
which are analogous to their pairs lapply
, sapply
, and Map
from base R. This is also true for the batchtools
package which has btlapply
and btmapply
.
fixed on f4894dce67a11259cd983a50708b0bf3d437951d
Hi, I would like to follow up on this issue. rslurm::slurm_apply
was intended from the beginning to be analogous to mapply
in base R, and in our development version on GitHub we also have a function slurm_map
that is analogous to lapply
in base R or purrr::map
. The syntax of both was designed to match their base R counterparts. Therefore I think it's appropriate to say "yes" for the 2nd column entry for the rslurm package in the comparison table. Thanks!
WIll change it asap :). Thanks for the update!
Thanks!!!
1) rslurm package has always been active, and is currently active to present 2) rslurm::slurm_apply() provides functionality similar to the apply family in base R, so table should read "yes"