Perform a content audit of current NRM to inform a future IA

[cmajel]

Background As we think more about the future state, we want to verify our understanding of what content exists on the current NRM application to inform our prototyping and how we think about future workflows.

We'll know we're done when...

• [ ] A content audit of current NRM exists
• [ ] We have a draft IA for a future system to guide our work

Tasks

• [ ] Microrequest for a content designer?
• [ ] Review current NRM
• [ ] Review current Django admin
• [ ] Cross reference with to-be blueprint - are these aligned? #118
• [ ] Document a draft IA and open questions

Open questions

• How should we test this with people who use G&A?
• I'm thinking this is looking at the end-to-end experience, should we downscope?

[cmajel]

I started a bit of this before seeing it was moved to the icebox. What I've done so far is document the current inbox structure and views in NRM G&A in this mural.

[tbaxter-18f]

This is just my opinion, but I think the current NRM IA and content strategy is fractured and haphazard enough that a content audit of it is of limited value. I do think bringing in a content designer on a microrequest (or short engagement) makes a LOT of sense, though.