As a permit purchaser, I need to choose the pilot Forest I'd like to visit from the landing page, so that I can get forest-specific information that I need to plan my trip.

[MelissaBraxton]

Background Since we paused the project, the open forest team has designed and mocked up a landing page that allows people to choose from different permit types and choose a location. So we'll need review their design and ours against the needs we identified in our research and refine as needed.

We'll need to ensure that firewood is front and center so that folks understand what the site is for and whether they can get what they need.

Acceptance criteria

• [x] User can select a forest participating in the pilot
• [x] User can understand which forests are participating in the firewood pilot

Tasks

• [x] Establish where firewood permitting will exist within Open Forest architecture
• [x] Create Firewood permitting environment(s) as needed
• [x] Review OF landing page
• [x] Review 18F mocks and task flow
• [x] Review user needs statements from firewood permitting research
• [x] Mock up refinements as needed
• [x] PO reviews and provides feedback
• [x] Build page based on mocks
• [x] Validation of acceptance criteria completed
• [x] Design review
• [x] Code review
• [x] Product Owner Approved

Definition of done

• [ ] 
e2e tests are updated for application routing changes.
• [ ]  e2e tests are functioning.
• [ ]  Child routes for existing pages are working.
• [ ] Pull requests meet technical definition of done.
• [x] Usability tested

[MelissaBraxton]

MVP pilot forests

Region 1

• Idaho Panhandle
• Flathead National Forest

Region 8

• George-Washington Jefferson
• Chattahoochee-Oconee

Region 9

• Hiawatha

Release 2 pilot forests

Region 2

• Shoshone
• Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison (GMUG)

[carlsonem]

@aQuib Did you and Mark have a chance to discuss this issue? It would be good if we could get a design put together for this while Mark is out this week. I would imagine we could make it very similar to the Christmas tree landing page. https://open-forest-staging.app.cloud.gov/christmas-trees/forests

[MelissaBraxton]

~The mocks we left off with after usability test 1 before we had to pause work back in Jan. are a great starting point and a well reasoned hypothesis: https://gsa.invisionapp.com/share/R3VA86RNPWK#/screens/397192438~

Eep. I meant this comment for #121. Apologies for any confusion.

[aQuib]

@carlsonem - Mark and I were not able to discuss prior to his absence this week. But the goal is the formulate a design by this week along with an accompanying research plan.

[MelissaBraxton]

I added a task for PO @csstarling to review mocks before any dev work begins to make it explicit, since he may not yet be in the flow of responding to GitHub notifications as folks add comments.

[Rebekah-Hernandez]

@csstarling @tram Here are the hi fi mockups of the timber landing page to review:

https://usfs.app.box.com/file/681029607933

[carlsonem]

@aQuib I believe you have a site map put together for firewood. If so, would you be able to upload it to this issue.

[aQuib]

@csstarling @tram Here is initial site for proposed firewood lading page

[MelissaBraxton]

Tagging @timoballard for code review as needed.

[Rebekah-Hernandez]

@briandavidson Here is the hifi mockup of the timber landing page: https://usfs.app.box.com/file/681029607933

The hero image is located here: https://usfs.app.box.com/file/626637737090

[carlsonem]

@aQuib @briandavidson do either of you happen to have an update on this issue?

[aQuib]

@carlsonem - This should be in development now based on my understanding since the design aspects are completed. I will unassign myself, add 'engineering label' and assign to @briandavidson.

@briandavidson - If I am mistaken, let me know.

[mtlaney]

@csstarling for this story we're looking to make sure the landing page looks similar to the design here https://usfs.app.box.com/file/681029607933. You may need to scroll down to the 3rd design to see the matching design.

[csstarling]

@mtlaney are you co-owner of the box folder? If so could you give me permission to view? or know who is?

https://usfs.app.box.com/file/681029607933

[csstarling]

I noticed Hiawathia N F. is not on the drop-down list and I will approve when it is added.

[csstarling]

BTW the landing page has some text that needs cleaned up. for example the page has [object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object.

[mtlaney]

@csstarling merging Hiawathia into dev now, and looking into the Object display. Will let you know when it's ready for re-testing. Thanks for all your help!

[mtlaney]

@csstarling merging Hiawathia into dev now, and looking into the Object display. Will let you know when it's ready for re-testing. Thanks for all your help!

Should be good now

[MelissaBraxton]

Added design and code review tasks.

[csstarling]

Hiawatha is now available.

[jstrothman]

@Rebekah-Hernandez Could I ask you to upload the hifi mockup to this issue? (I don't have Box access/USFS email address, but having mocks here also helps people looking back at related issues to see evolution.) Thank you in advance!

[Rebekah-Hernandez]

@jstrothman Here are screenshots of the mock up that I posted above. The footer is the normal Open Forest footer.

[jstrothman]

Design review

@Rebekah-Hernandez @aQuib @mtlaney Looks great

Adjustment request

• [ ] Change "Firewood" to use a lowercase "f" in the two instances in: "Buy a Firewood permit with Open Forest The U.S. Forest Service invites you to purchase permits to harvest Firewood in some national forests, following certain rules and guidelines."

[jstrothman]

cc @csstarling

[csstarling]

@aQuib , @Rebekah-Hernandez , @mtlaney Please consider @jstrothman above comments. these changes will be helpful and once implemented we can move this Story to Ready for Master.

[jstrothman]

@mtlaney On Dev, it looks like "Firewood" still needs to change to lowercase "f" as described above.

[mtlaney]

@jstrothman thanks I somehow missed this one, will ping you once it's back up on dev

[mtlaney]

@jstrothman should be ready for a re-review

[jstrothman]

@csstarling This looks good: ready to move forward.

[MelissaBraxton]

@abdul-fs - Can you please take a look and check whether this meets the technical def of done?

[abdul-fs]

@Rebekah-Hernandez @Dmac26 @mwreiss Can you validate this and marked as completed?

[Rebekah-Hernandez]

Not sure if I can mark off on all of the definitions of done but it looks correct up on staging. @abdul-fs @mwreiss @Dmac26

[MelissaBraxton]

LGTM! @bboddiger - moving this to ready for main.