As the GMUG NF POC, I want my Forest’s firewood permitting information available on the Staging site so that I can verify that users will be able to get the information they need to safely and legally harvest firewood on my forest.

[MelissaBraxton]

Background This issue is to take whatever content is currently available for firewood permitting and begin to populate the forest specific info page in Open Forest and identify information gaps.

Acceptance criteria

• [x] A forest-specific page for firewood permitting exists in Open Forest staging
• [x] Available content on forest-specific information page is viewable in staging
• [x] forest POC has can view their forest's content in staging

Tasks

• [x] Get available content online
• [x] Get available content from Forest POC
• [x] Format forest content (low-fi, in a Box note)
• [x] Share formatted forest content w/ POC for review
• [x] Populate content matrix with approved content for devs
• [x] Add forest to the seeder file
• [x] Devs populate template info page with content from matrix
• [x] Document content gaps and create new stories as needed
• [x] Ensure that forest POC has access to staging site
• [x] Design review
• [x] Code review

Definition of done

• [x] e2e tests are updated for application routing changes.
• [x] e2e tests are functioning.
• [x] Child routes for existing pages are working.
• [x] Pull requests meet technical definition of done.

[aQuib]

Still awaiting response from POCs (of which one is on vacation til next week)

[aQuib]

We have received feedback on the content from POC, but need clarification on a few remaining issues.

[carlsonem]

@Rebekah-Hernandez any update on this one?

[Rebekah-Hernandez]

My apologies, @carlsonem . I had completed the information last week but forgot to assign it to Dylan. He's aware of it now. Here is the content curated for GMUG: https://usfs.app.box.com/notes/693423559218

[carlsonem]

@Dmac26 where does this one stand?

[MelissaBraxton]

Added design and code review tasks.

[mgwalker]

code reviewed

[jstrothman]

@aQuib @Rebekah-Hernandez @mtlaney Similar to a few other forests, the side nav has "How to plan your trip" but the section doesn't exist in the content

[jstrothman]

@csstarling The side nav link to "How to plan your trip" has been removed, so this can move forward. @mtlaney Is there any additional peer validation you need?

[mtlaney]

looks g2g

[MelissaBraxton]

Nvm, @abdul-fs!