Open MelissaBraxton opened 4 years ago
@csstarling - You may have additional acceptance criteria to add. We can discuss at our regular mtg tomorrow.
Split into other issues
Heads up @carlsonem - In chatting with @bboddiger, we think we may have archived this prematurely. We are reviving this story to make sure we have a way to meet resource managers reporting needs. The mapping issues cover back end data flow, but not the front end process for USFS staff accessing it. @bboddiger and @csstarling will prioritize this one.
This task is focused on user testing to confirm that the end users are able to find data/transactions as noted above. Will want to conduct user testing. Need to refine tasks to add items such as recruiting testers and such.
Background This follows up on issue #135 to actually build out and test how special forest products managers will get data on species, product, unit of measure and volume from a front end perspective. We think this need will be via our integrations with FPFS and TIM, but we want to check and make sure. If not, we'll need to design and develop a means for special forest products managers to get this information. We could
Acceptance criteria Special forest products managers I can can:
Tasks
Definition of done