As a permit purchaser, I would like the standardization of firewood content so that I can intuitively identify relevant information for each pilot forest.

[aQuib]

Background This issue is to take approved content for the firewood permitting pages and standardize the structure for intuitiveness and facilitate content management for development.

Acceptance Criteria

• [x] Available content on forest-specific information page is standardized

Stories within this Epic

• [x] Obtain approval for 7/8 piot forest firewood permitting content
• [x] Populate content standardization matrix
• [x] Schedule meeting to discuss and document content gaps
• [x] Identify any content firewood outliers from a particular forest
• [x] Schedule meeting with developers to understand technical restrictions
• [x] Share with forest POC content standardization matrix for feedback
• [x] Forest POC share with LEOs for content prioritization
• [x] Standardize content structure and format based on insights
• [x] Update available pilot forest firewood content to the new standard
• [x] Create a new issue to ensure standardized content is delivered to the development team to be implemented updates

Epic Tasks

• [x] Validation of acceptance criteria completed
• [x] PO approved

Definition of Done

• [ ] Acceptance criteria met

[Rebekah-Hernandez]

Here is the content matrix for easy comparison between forests: https://usfs.app.box.com/file/693914880995

[Rebekah-Hernandez]

More in depth update @bboddiger :

• I have a more updated matrix from the current forest feedback here: https://usfs.app.box.com/file/704320788405 I will be updating the Idaho Panhandle forest this afternoon.
• Idaho Panhandle POC brought in the region 1 director on the email thread and I will forward this to you. Are they better equipped to standardize language across the forests?
• Shoshone has POC Randy Spierling on a fire assignment for 2 weeks.
• Chattahoochee-Oconee and Hiawatha have not responded yet. Last email sent was this past Friday.

[Rebekah-Hernandez]

@bboddiger @csstarling Update for this story is that I have heard back from every forest except for Chattahoochee-Oconee. Would you like me to email again or is there a different contact?

All of the information has been compiled here: https://usfs.app.box.com/file/709474700305 as the most updated version of the matrix.

[csstarling]

@Rebekah-Hernandez @bboddiger, I called Chattahoochee-Oconee POC Sarah Paski and her voicemail recording is now someone else in her position. I called her supervisor and left a voicemail asking who we can contact.

[csstarling]

@Rebekah-Hernandez , I just got word from Sarah Paski's supervisor that you can e-mail him and he will help you out. His contact info: Mike Brod, mike.brod@usda.gov

[Rebekah-Hernandez]

Thank you @csstarling I cc'd you on the email I sent him

[aQuib]

Research insights from #33 are to be used to 'Forest POC share with LEOs for content prioritization'

[Rebekah-Hernandez]

Card #182 has been created for the developer side of this story.

[Rebekah-Hernandez]

@carlsonem Final iteration of the forest content standardization for firewood is here: https://usfs.app.box.com/file/711448400467

As far as individual forest rules will allow us to standardize, the standardization of the Open Forest pilot content for firewood is complete. While there was much that could not be standardized, we found that the greatest room for standardization was within regions. Forests were more willing to match language of other forests within their region. However, it was much harder to standardize content between regions, so most of the differences in language on similar topics are found here. Some content was able to be changed by a simple rearranging of the sentence while keeping all of the same language, so where this was possible, the UX team made these changes. In some places, this was not possible and there is still much content that was unable to be standardized as directed from forest POCs. As much as possible, the firewood content is standardized for the pilot forests.