Open Dmac26 opened 4 years ago
Obtain the information for the limits on the content standardization page
@Dmac26 Finally received confirmation from the last forest today so here are the maximum limits for the forests. Chattahoochee's is so high because they don't have a set limit so it is the national handbook's maximum.
Idaho Panhandle: 4 cord minimum purchase - 12 cord max limit Flathead: 4 cord minimum purchase - 12 cord max limit George Washington and Jefferson: 6 cord purchase only allowed Chattahoochee-Oconee: 3 cord minimum purchase - 200 cord max limit Hiawatha: 4 cord minimum purchase - 20 cord max limit GMUG: 4 cord minimum purchase - 20 cord max limit Shoshone: 3 cord minimum purchase - 10 cord max limit
@MelissaBraxton @aQuib @tram - Hey everybody, I was looking through the "ready" column and came across this one. I was under the impression we were moving away from a dropdown and using an input field instead. I've already made the change for that as I was working on card 113 and it works well, but I can definitely take this on if I was mistaken.
@Dmac26 - You're correct that the text input is the path forward. I'm a little unclear as the history behind this issue, and it doesn't have any acceptance criteria. It mentions a bug/typo, but it looks like it's about restricting users to purchasing more than the max allowed per forest, which is covered under #113. @Dmac26 it looks like you created this issues--with the work covered under 113 can it be closed?
Calculations appear to be correct on the open forest side. We will need to verify we are sending the right amount to pay.gov
Background The current dropdown selection for the number of cords a user can choose is only showing the option "4". Ideally the dropdown would present a range from the minimum to the maximum permissible number of cords. Each forest has a different minimum and maximum and the dropdown should reflect each forest's standards with accompanying validation.
Acceptance criteria
Tasks
Definition of done