search

USDAForestService / USFS-timber-permitting

The focal point for an 18F/TTS project with the United States Forest Service on timber permitting
Other
6 stars 3 forks source link

Determine if MVP requires a user to select a district #198

Open carlsonem opened 3 years ago

carlsonem commented 3 years ago

Background What should we consider when addressing this issue?

Acceptance criteria

Tasks

aQuib commented 3 years ago

The list of pilot forests who provided one district and ranger for permit is located here (see excel sheet 'FS2400-1 Districts').

aQuib commented 3 years ago

All pilot forests has agreed to provide one district and one FS ranger for the FS2400-1 except for Chattahoochee-Oconee (still awaiting feedback).

However, George-Washington Jefferson NF would like to use the supervisor office as the district (which is not listed in TIM). @bboddiger - Would this be problematic for NRM reporting?

cc. @smahmudFS @mwreiss

bboddiger commented 3 years ago

This needs to be a district code/name for sending to FPFS and assigning a proclaimed unit, so the Supervisors office won’t work. Let’s regroup on this and think about the path forward a little bit. As subbing in for product owner, I need to get caught up on what decision making process has been to this point. Let’s talk.

Thanks, beth

From: aQuib Sylvester notifications@github.com Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 12:41 PM To: USDAForestService/USFS-timber-permitting USFS-timber-permitting@noreply.github.com Cc: Boddiger, Beth -FS beth.boddiger@usda.gov; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [USDAForestService/USFS-timber-permitting] Determine if MVP requires a user to select a district (#198)

All pilot forests has agreed to provide one district and one FS ranger for the FS2400-1 except for Chattahoochee-Oconee (still awaiting feedback).

However, George-Washington Jefferson NF would like to use the supervisor office as the district (which is not listed in TIM). @bboddigerhttps://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fbboddiger&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccfbaa28747ef44776f6708d86570606d%7Ced5b36e701ee4ebc867ee03cfa0d4697%7C0%7C0%7C637370880613421988&sdata=n9SPHeF%2FVSYO%2BjnjYpYuaNvCz9lgPcyEa2sXCW30JHc%3D&reserved=0 - Would this be problematic for NRM reporting?

cc. @smahmudFShttps://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FsmahmudFS&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccfbaa28747ef44776f6708d86570606d%7Ced5b36e701ee4ebc867ee03cfa0d4697%7C0%7C0%7C637370880613421988&sdata=HVNrNJNPF0XZnZJkOUnMIxIZUFu72Tr07G%2B4dK24qqo%3D&reserved=0 @mwreisshttps://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmwreiss&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccfbaa28747ef44776f6708d86570606d%7Ced5b36e701ee4ebc867ee03cfa0d4697%7C0%7C0%7C637370880613431944&sdata=AeybvEGSRdz%2FfNiOb1358d0eYlEpoYgBy4ZbaFwS38w%3D&reserved=0

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FUSDAForestService%2FUSFS-timber-permitting%2Fissues%2F198%23issuecomment-701571941&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccfbaa28747ef44776f6708d86570606d%7Ced5b36e701ee4ebc867ee03cfa0d4697%7C0%7C0%7C637370880613431944&sdata=8bUJoRy04G%2BFILYx7vRx5AaDksD5cCwsCSWj2h1Q2cc%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAN4LDRNMFS5PU7OPXICKP7TSIN3TXANCNFSM4R43KETQ&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ccfbaa28747ef44776f6708d86570606d%7Ced5b36e701ee4ebc867ee03cfa0d4697%7C0%7C0%7C637370880613431944&sdata=BxvKSiZ22zfJ3tQhFObQLhiP7yPwRIUp9%2FcJtsBlWcQ%3D&reserved=0.

This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.

aQuib commented 3 years ago

The decision was made for user to select district. All details and requires associate with that selection is document in #156

bboddiger commented 3 years ago

There may be more than one district provided for forests that contain more than one proclaimed unit within their boundaries. Details found in #156