Add default EPA citation options to Resource Quality entries

[torrin47]

From @joeponcy on February 1, 2017 23:37

• [ ] Add control to "Add Default EPA QAPP"
• [x] @torrin47 will provide citation text and references

Copied from original issue: Innovate-Inc/EMEMetadataToolKit#130

[torrin47]

Ok, here's a default non-conformance conformance result (the non-conformance part is how EME 3.2.1 handled it) along with a complete citation of "EPA Guidance for Geospatially Related Quality Assurance Project Plans", which is a beast of a doc that more people should probably read despite its age. Are we thinking that the result will be inserted by default, or just the citation?

<measResult>
    <ConResult xmlns="">
        <conSpec xmlns="">
            <resTitle>EPA Guidance for Geospatially Related Quality Assurance Project Plans</resTitle>
            <date>
                <pubDate>2003-03-03</pubDate>
            </date>
            <citOnlineRes xmlns="">
                <linkage>https://www.epa.gov/geospatial/epa-guidance-geospatially-related-quality-assurance-project-plans</linkage>
                <protocol>information</protocol>
                <appProfile>PDF</appProfile>
                <orDesc>This document contains advice and recommendations for developing a QA Project Plan for projects involving geospatial data, including both newly collected data and data acquired from other sources. </orDesc>
                <orFunct>
                    <OnFunctCd value="010"/>
                </orFunct>
            </citOnlineRes>
            <citRespParty xmlns="">
                <rpOrgName>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information</rpOrgName>
                <rpIndName>U.S. EPA Quality Staff</rpIndName>
                <rpPosName>Coordinator</rpPosName>
                <rpCntInfo xmlns="">
                    <cntAddress addressType="both">
                        <delPoint>1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.</delPoint>
                        <city>Washington</city>
                        <adminArea>DC </adminArea>
                        <postCode>20460</postCode>
                        <eMailAdd>quality@epa.gov</eMailAdd>
                        <country>US</country>
                    </cntAddress>
                    <cntPhone>
                        <voiceNum tddtty="">(202) 564-6830</voiceNum>
                        <faxNum>202-565-2441</faxNum>
                    </cntPhone>
                    <cntOnlineRes xmlns="">
                        <linkage>http://www.epa.gov/quality</linkage>
                        <protocol>website</protocol>
                        <orFunct>
                            <OnFunctCd value="002"/>
                        </orFunct>
                    </cntOnlineRes>
                </rpCntInfo>
                <displayName>U.S. EPA Quality Staff</displayName>
                <role>
                    <RoleCd value="010"/>
                </role>
            </citRespParty>
        </conSpec>
        <conExpl>Conformance tests have not been performed.</conExpl>
        <conPass>0</conPass>
    </ConResult>
</measResult>

[torrin47]

From @joeponcy on March 10, 2017 19:42

I think the result will be added by default. Is that what we want?

Joseph Poncy GIS Analyst/Developer Innovate! Inc. Cell: 208-597-3883

Innovate!, Inc. is a Virginia-based 8(a), Hispanic- and woman-owned business delivering Geospatial, Information Technology, Security, Business Consulting, Project Management and Executive Coaching solutions to our government and private sector clients. Check us out at www.innovateteam.com http://www.innovateteam.com/.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Torrin Hultgren notifications@github.com wrote:

Ok, here's a default non-conformance conformance result (the non-conformance part is how EME 3.2.1 handled it) along with a complete citation of "EPA Guidance for Geospatially Related Quality Assurance Project Plans", which is a beast of a doc that more people should probably read despite its age. Are we thinking that the result will be inserted by default, or just the citation?

EPA Guidance for Geospatially Related Quality Assurance Project Plans 2003-03-03 https://www.epa.gov/geospatial/epa-guidance-geospatially-related-quality-assurance-project-plans information PDF This document contains advice and recommendations for developing a QA Project Plan for projects involving geospatial data, including both newly collected data and data acquired from other sources. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information U.S. EPA Quality Staff Coordinator 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington DC 20460 quality@epa.gov US (202) 564-6830 202-565-2441 <(202)%20565-2441> http://www.epa.gov/ website Ana Greene Conformance tests have not been performed. 0

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Innovate-Inc/EMEMetadataToolKit/issues/130#issuecomment-285758780, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFE9bTCUpD9o-q6HxJBJ8SreiNokMLDkks5rkaFMgaJpZM4L0iK2 .

[torrin47]

My only concern about adding the result by default is that the current interface nests/hides that content, so it would be easy for a metadata steward to overlook the fact that we'd inserted a "non-conformance" result into their record. I have no qualms about them not noticing we added the QAPP citation, but I'd really like them to see the result (with the hopes that they will take the time to edit and update). If we leave the result blank, then they get the validation error telling them to go enter a result, and we just help them out by adding the citation?

[torrin47]

From @joeponcy on March 10, 2017 20:44

That makes sense.

Joseph Poncy GIS Analyst/Developer Innovate! Inc. Cell: 208-597-3883

Innovate!, Inc. is a Virginia-based 8(a), Hispanic- and woman-owned business delivering Geospatial, Information Technology, Security, Business Consulting, Project Management and Executive Coaching solutions to our government and private sector clients. Check us out at www.innovateteam.com http://www.innovateteam.com/.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Torrin Hultgren notifications@github.com wrote:

My only concern about adding the result by default is that the current interface nests/hides that content, so it would be easy for a metadata steward to overlook the fact that we'd inserted a "non-conformance" result into their record. I have no qualms about them not noticing we added the QAPP citation, but I'd really like them to see the result (with the hopes that they will take the time to edit and update). If we leave the result blank, then they get the validation error telling them to go enter a result, and we just help them out by adding the citation?

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Innovate-Inc/EMEMetadataToolKit/issues/130#issuecomment-285770620, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFE9baDxL8GKB0dN_-iB4TcrbObtJKz9ks5rkax8gaJpZM4L0iK2 .

[torrin47]

From @joeponcy on March 16, 2017 18:37

Is this how we want this section to look? Due to being embedded several levels deep, this section is not as simple as originally anticipated. This will not make it into the initial EME 5.0 Beta release.

[torrin47]

Yes, that's pretty much how we want it to look, and understood - the section is optional and has always been underutilized, any assistance we can provide is gravy but not critical.

[torrin47]

Included in next release via revisions to merge tool and Generic template.