USEPA / EPA_Environmental_Dataset_Gateway

U.S. EPA’s Metadata Catalog
https://edg.epa.gov
3 stars 2 forks source link

Elements: Temporal Extent, Update Frequency, Release Date #74

Closed torrin47 closed 5 years ago

torrin47 commented 5 years ago

All of these elements are optional and should validate as ISO 8601 Dates or ranges. Maybe they could be grouped?

jzichichi commented 5 years ago

@torrin47 - @aergul and I were wondering which element "Release Date" maps to in the POD schema?

torrin47 commented 5 years ago

Not sure how to explain why the element name is so different from the Label - the element name is "issued":

https://project-open-data.cio.gov/v1.1/schema/#issued

aergul commented 5 years ago

Does "issued" or equivalent appear in EPA schema?

torrin47 commented 5 years ago

Ahh, yes, so the technical specification was intended to be limited to those elements that were:

  1. Mandatory in POD or
  2. Mandatory in ISO or
  3. Where EPA had some additional guidance or requirement above and beyond the base guidance for those schemas.

issued is one of those elements that are optional and we had nothing to add to the POD guidance. There are only a few others that fall into this category, but we do need to include them in this tool - I'm pretty sure I captured them all in GitHub issues. And that means we also need to include them in our guidance JSON - using the guidance from the Project Open Data site.

aergul commented 5 years ago

I'm putting this out there without a separate field for update frequency for now. It doesn't make sense to have two separate widgets to enter the periodicity of the data set. I'm inclined to have "Last Update" be a date entry only and "Update Frequency" to be the vehicle for entering periodicity (as @torrin47 suggested in #67 ) and handle json element generation behind the scenes but it has implications for validation and guidance that we might want to talk about before doing so.

jzichichi commented 5 years ago

@aergul - perhaps we can discuss this Monday at our check-in. I agree it seems confusing to have the user enter periodicity twice.

torrin47 commented 5 years ago

Going to let user optionally leave last update blank and use periodicity to set repeating interval. if both are blank, both are invalid.

aergul commented 5 years ago

Changes implemented

jzichichi commented 5 years ago

@aergul - appears to work as described above. Moving to EPA column for @torrin47 to review

torrin47 commented 5 years ago

👍

torrin47 commented 5 years ago

This issue was moved to USEPA/EPA_Non-geo_Metadata_Editor#13

torrin47 commented 5 years ago

This issue was moved to USEPA/EPA_Non-geo_Metadata_Editor#14