Closed torrin47 closed 5 years ago
@torrin47 - @aergul and I were wondering which element "Release Date" maps to in the POD schema?
Not sure how to explain why the element name is so different from the Label - the element name is "issued":
Does "issued" or equivalent appear in EPA schema?
Ahh, yes, so the technical specification was intended to be limited to those elements that were:
issued is one of those elements that are optional and we had nothing to add to the POD guidance. There are only a few others that fall into this category, but we do need to include them in this tool - I'm pretty sure I captured them all in GitHub issues. And that means we also need to include them in our guidance JSON - using the guidance from the Project Open Data site.
I'm putting this out there without a separate field for update frequency for now. It doesn't make sense to have two separate widgets to enter the periodicity of the data set. I'm inclined to have "Last Update" be a date entry only and "Update Frequency" to be the vehicle for entering periodicity (as @torrin47 suggested in #67 ) and handle json element generation behind the scenes but it has implications for validation and guidance that we might want to talk about before doing so.
@aergul - perhaps we can discuss this Monday at our check-in. I agree it seems confusing to have the user enter periodicity twice.
Going to let user optionally leave last update blank and use periodicity to set repeating interval. if both are blank, both are invalid.
Changes implemented
@aergul - appears to work as described above. Moving to EPA column for @torrin47 to review
👍
This issue was moved to USEPA/EPA_Non-geo_Metadata_Editor#13
This issue was moved to USEPA/EPA_Non-geo_Metadata_Editor#14
All of these elements are optional and should validate as ISO 8601 Dates or ranges. Maybe they could be grouped?