search

USEPA / flowsa

Library that attributes resource use, waste, emissions, and loss to economic sectors
MIT License
23 stars 19 forks source link

"Commercial" mapped differently in stateGHGI and GHGI #370

Closed WesIngwersen closed 12 months ago

WesIngwersen commented 12 months ago

in stateGHGI mapping https://github.com/USEPA/flowsa/blob/2db51cfd74c11bfedb894000350826f47e9763d3/flowsa/data/activitytosectormapping/NAICS_Crosswalk_EPA_StateGHGI.csv?plain=1#L61

the assignments to 2213 and 92* sectors are missing where they are present in the national model

https://github.com/USEPA/flowsa/blob/2db51cfd74c11bfedb894000350826f47e9763d3/flowsa/data/activitytosectormapping/NAICS_Crosswalk_EPA_GHGI.csv?plain=1#L156

https://github.com/USEPA/flowsa/blob/2db51cfd74c11bfedb894000350826f47e9763d3/flowsa/data/activitytosectormapping/NAICS_Crosswalk_EPA_GHGI.csv?plain=1#L172C14-L172C14

bl-young commented 12 months ago

Yes this was a recent change because if we map to 2213, it will use stateio use table data for fuel consumption for 22, which includes electricity, and as a result the allocation to 2213 is very large.

bl-young commented 12 months ago

923 was added for CO2 eg., https://github.com/USEPA/flowsa/blob/2db51cfd74c11bfedb894000350826f47e9763d3/flowsa/data/activitytosectormapping/NAICS_Crosswalk_EPA_StateGHGI.csv#L92 but I may have missed it for the CH4 activity set I will check.

bl-young commented 12 months ago

Expected changes, CH4 and N2O assigned to 923 pulled from other commercial sectors: comm_923.csv

bl-young commented 12 months ago

Interpreting your reaction as approval on the 2213 @WesIngwersen so closing this issue