Closed WesIngwersen closed 12 months ago
Yes this was a recent change because if we map to 2213, it will use stateio use table data for fuel consumption for 22, which includes electricity, and as a result the allocation to 2213 is very large.
923
was added for CO2 eg.,
https://github.com/USEPA/flowsa/blob/2db51cfd74c11bfedb894000350826f47e9763d3/flowsa/data/activitytosectormapping/NAICS_Crosswalk_EPA_StateGHGI.csv#L92
but I may have missed it for the CH4 activity set I will check.
Expected changes, CH4 and N2O assigned to 923 pulled from other commercial sectors: comm_923.csv
Interpreting your reaction as approval on the 2213 @WesIngwersen so closing this issue
in stateGHGI mapping https://github.com/USEPA/flowsa/blob/2db51cfd74c11bfedb894000350826f47e9763d3/flowsa/data/activitytosectormapping/NAICS_Crosswalk_EPA_StateGHGI.csv?plain=1#L61
the assignments to 2213 and 92* sectors are missing where they are present in the national model
https://github.com/USEPA/flowsa/blob/2db51cfd74c11bfedb894000350826f47e9763d3/flowsa/data/activitytosectormapping/NAICS_Crosswalk_EPA_GHGI.csv?plain=1#L156
https://github.com/USEPA/flowsa/blob/2db51cfd74c11bfedb894000350826f47e9763d3/flowsa/data/activitytosectormapping/NAICS_Crosswalk_EPA_GHGI.csv?plain=1#L172C14-L172C14