duplicate findingProcess property definition

[zednis]

I noticed today that we have 2 definitions for gcis:findingProcess.

starting at line 735 in the TTL:

gcis:findingProcess a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
    rdfs:label "Finding Process" ;
    rdfs:comment "A finding has a description of the process through which it was derived." ;
    rdfs:domain gcis:Finding ;
    rdfs:range xsd:string .

gcis:findingStatement a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
    rdfs:label "Key finding" ;
    rdfs:comment "The text of the Finding of a Highly Influential Scientific Assessment." ;
    rdfs:domain gcis:Finding ;
    rdfs:range xsd:string .

gcis:findingProcess a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
    rdfs:label "Finding Process" ;
    rdfs:comment "A finding contains a description of the process used in order to reach the Finding." ;
    rdfs:domain gcis:Finding ;
    rdfs:range xsd:string .

They are the same except for the slight difference in the comment. Removing one of them seems straightforward enough.

@justgo129 @rewolfe which comment would like us to retain?

[justgo129]

Excellent catch. I like the second one with the caveat that "it" replaces "the finding" at the end if the label.

[zednis]

Pull request created. I am fine with merging now or waiting for Robert to chime in on the preferred comment.

[justgo129]

Let's wait for @rewolfe. Thanks, @zednis.

[rewolfe]

@zednis, I'm okay with @justgo129 recommendation.

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:19 PM, justgo129 notifications@github.com wrote:

Let's wait for @rewolfe https://github.com/rewolfe. Thanks, @zednis https://github.com/zednis.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/issues/134#issuecomment-134410148 .

Robert Wolfe, NASA GSFC @ USGCRP, o: 202-419-3470, m: 301-257-6966

[zednis]

:+1: merging pull request.