Closed justgo129 closed 8 years ago
duplicate of #148?
Good catch, I wonder why this keeps happening. I just closed #148; let's work with #149 (this one).
@zednis @rewolfe I'd like to discuss this further (even offline) upon your return from PTO. Thanks.
:+1: I will be back to normal work on the 28th (Monday)
I will be back in the office Oct. 5.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Stephan Zednik notifications@github.com wrote:
[image: :+1:] I will be back to normal work on the 28th (Monday)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/issues/149#issuecomment-142117063 .
Robert Wolfe, NASA GSFC @ USGCRP, o: 202-419-3470, m: 301-257-6966
Sounds good. Tabled #149 until the week of October 5.
October update: @zednis is looking into this issue and will report back.
Per today's discussion, we will name the updated version GCIS 2.0 upon the closure of the github issues.
What do we want the owl:versionIRI
to be?
Options:
1) This should be a resolvable URL where we will make the 2.0 version of the ontology available 2) My preference is to leave the .owl off the URI 3) We should have HTML documentation for this specific version available at the URI using content negotiation - which is why I have my preference stated in (2)
Do we want to add a owl:versionIRI
for version 1.2?
Additional note, when we decide on version 2.0 we should create a release of the ontology in github
Continuation of https://github.com/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/pull/54