Closed xgmachina closed 8 years ago
Per the discussion in #12
:+1: @rewolfe are we good to merge?
Sure.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, justgo129 notifications@github.com wrote:
[image: :+1:] @rewolfe https://github.com/rewolfe are we good to merge?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/pull/159#issuecomment-147842253.
Robert Wolfe, NASA GSFC @ USGCRP, o: 202-419-3470, m: 301-257-6966
Merged #159.
@zednis @xgmachina could we modify the definition for gcis:derivedModelRunOutputs at: https://github.com/USGCRP/gcis-ontology/commit/2ec2336f499bd60c8ebbaaaf393c0602ea7a2a42 ?
I'm not sure I understand it; is the word "from" missing? Thanks.
The from is not missing, the property is for the relationship from the scenario to the derived modelrun outputs.
ex:some_scenario gcis:derivedModelRunOutputs ex:some_model_run_outputs
I'll rephrase; I don't actually understand the definition. I think "A scenario...derived one or more model outputs outputs" reads somewhat awkwardly to me.
ok, I'll create a new ticket for that discussion.
Added three properties: gcis:derivedFromScenario gcis:derivedModelRunOutputs gcis:contributedModel