Closed lomky closed 5 years ago
I believe the likelihood tables are with the Key Findings, not with the Figures. Basically same issue, but changes what they would be linked to.
corrected. Thanks @rasherman!
Here are the two arrays I've created. Let me know what you think. @rasherman @lomky
I didn't want to create table inside the report as this is just for reference and provenance purpose. Note that I have used the relationship prov:wasInformedBy and will be using the same term while I relate these arrays to 'key findings'. Any objection or suggestion?
@amruelama did we decide to go with method 3 then? I was actually leaning towards using the existing Executive Summaries figures and related it via provenance.
Would everyone be okay with discussing this at a tagup and seeing if we can make a decision?
We're going to go with path 4, and use prov:wasDerivedFrom
to connect the Findings to the Figures.
@lomky Correction to path 4 - The figure 'Confidence/Likelihood' appears in the Front Matter of CSSR
It looks like the finding page doesn't display the provenance relationship, but I can see the relationship displayed on figure page - https://data-stage.globalchange.gov/report/climate-science-special-report/chapter/front-matter/figure/confidence---likelihood. Should we change the display for findings in this case?
Yup. Please add a ticket for it!
The CSSR has a likelihood table and a confidence table that displays with each finding to contextualize the statements. GCIS needs to encapsulate this data in some ways.
Options:
Tables
and associate them with every CSSRfinding
finding
information. somewhere.Arrays
and associate them with every CSSRfinding
(bypasses theTables
problem from 1)Figures
containing this information from theExecutive Summary
& associate those with thefinding
s