The first one creates the compilation by using a list of AssemblyReferences. The second one, uses a list of AssemblyNames and it either resolves them or retrieves the values from a cache. If the platform that requires the validation already has an AssemblyReference, it should be able to forward without relying on CoreWF to resolve it.
This PR replaces the list of AssemblyNames with AssemblyReferences and uses the same approach as the full workflow validation to resolve the Assemblies.
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
There are two types of validation
The first one creates the compilation by using a list of
AssemblyReferences
. The second one, uses a list ofAssemblyNames
and it either resolves them or retrieves the values from a cache. If the platform that requires the validation already has anAssemblyReference
, it should be able to forward without relying on CoreWF to resolve it.This PR replaces the list of
AssemblyNames
withAssemblyReferences
and uses the same approach as the full workflow validation to resolve theAssemblies
.