Open Erin-Stephan opened 1 year ago
Thanks for the report. That's the normal behavior (the walls ending before the interface starts) so there is no bug there. It sounds like a good idea to me. Not so much for my single extruder because I need the air gap but using PVA on a dual extruder that nice shape instead of jaggy line ends might do some good as it would give the outer wall something solid to print on. I'll change this to a "Feature Request" rather than a bug report. Let us know if that's OK. You can change the title (I think) to make it more appropriate.
@GregValiant Sure, that would be great. I'll change the title
Hey @Erin-Stephan,
Our researchers also believe that this feature will increase surface quality, and they also reported it to us. We've added a ticket to the backlog with the intent to improve this. For internal reference CURA-9350
Thanks for the report! 👍
Application Version
5.0.0
Platform
MacOs 12.0.1
Printer
Ultimaker S5
Reproduction steps
Sliced Profile with zig zag infill for normal support, top support and bottom support. Selected "Support Wall Line Count: 1". Slice and preview
Actual results
Support walls are applied to normal support but not support roof or support floor.
Expected results
Support walls should be applied to support roof and walls. This gives better surface quality to the overhangs that are supported because for infills that aren't concentric, it provides a bridge pillar close to the wall and the contact surface is smoother on inclines because the touchpoint is a smooth line instead of, say, a zig zag.
Checklist of files to include
Additional information & file uploads
UMS5_SupportTest_SupportWallBug.3mf.zip