Closed ChrisAdderley closed 6 years ago
The problem with this proposal is that it is impossible to define a maximum density. Instead, I propose using CRP as a non linear scale below 1. I have posted the details a long time ago on the CRP discussion forum. The big advantage is that allows you to define planets atmosphere ranging from 100% to 0.000001%. Notice I have already callibrated rare resourses for helium3 lqdDeuterium and lqdHydrogen using this non linear scale.
It's probably better to actually discuss this on the forums so that other stakeholders can participate.
@ChrisAdderley - saw this was still being tweaked as of an hour ago - let me know when this is clear to merge in. Thanks!
@BobPalmer I addressed the comments by @sswelm just now. I believe it is good to merge, I will leave the tweaking of the version (I suggest bumping the major) to you.
The very small concentrations of many resources in atmospheric, oceanic and exoatmospheric resource definitions are entirely impossible to harvest given that the KSP
ResourceMap
cannot sample values below0.001
.This PR proposes shifting atmo, exo and oceanic distributions to relative concentrations, where 100% is now the maximum harvestable resource concentration anywhere. This has some advantages:
Efficiency
field of a converter.In addition this PR adds support for
LqdDeuterium
andAntimatter
as resources, and modifies the distribution ofLqdHydrogen
somewhat.