Closed arnoudvanderleer closed 2 months ago
@rmatthes I do not have a lot of experience with CI, but I based this on SetHITs
. Can you maybe take a look at this to check that it should work as expected?
All right, since the CI failed for commit 9f46247 with the same errors that I got locally, and succeeded for commit f507d9b, so the CI setup is at least somewhat correct. Note that both the CI here, and my local setup compile all files, but give a couple of warnings that xyz relies on an unsafe universe hierarchy
.
@arnoudvanderleer : thanks for preparing this, it's great.
Some small comments:
Check
commands are of pedagogical value. I am not sure it is a good idea to comment them out, even though I agree that they produce a lot of output.I am merging this, but let's discuss the questions I raise above.
All right
latest
, but I am not sure. I will try in a next PRCheck
commands intact. I only commented out the Search
commands. Of course, these also may be of pedagogical value, although anyone is able to uncomment them in their local installation of coq. I commented them out because it made it very hard to see where compilation failed, although I now realize that that is fixed with the --error-reporting=twice
flag.@arnoudvanderleer : sorry, I meant Search
, not Check
.
This is based on the setup in the
SetHITs
repository.