Closed marcbezem closed 1 year ago
2.12.8. Line 11 "In fact we will assume ... definitionally." is a bit weird, in particular combined with 3 lines down "not definitionally".
2.12.9. I change the wording a bit since I think -(-n) \jdeq n for all n in N^- can be misunderstood.
2.12.10. I added this exercise to implement a free-wheeling \equiv
See 5e7f1c5
2.12.8. Line 11 "In fact we will assume ... definitionally." is a bit weird, in particular combined with 3 lines down "not definitionally".
2.12.9. I change the wording a bit since I think -(-n) \jdeq n for all n in N^- can be misunderstood.
2.12.10. I added this exercise to implement a free-wheeling \equiv