Closed tutebatti closed 2 years ago
See (or edit) column name
in table external_database
.
Since I have not edited the database directly yet, what is the backup policy? Can I break something just editing the entries of that column (or the one mentioned in #85)?
I don't think you can "break" much (database and code-wise) editing the name column, or any other of the text columns. I would suggest keeping the hands off any columns that contain foreign keys (IDs from other tables). You can of course "break" stuff data-wise; i.e., the end result is different not only in spelling, but semantically, but that's under your control.
The database is backed up daily. The edits necessary here are less invasive than what is done daily via the GeoDB-Editor, and I think that in the last two years, we have not had to restore a backup yet.
Still, if you are more comfortable with that option, you can do the edit in a CSV file or Excel sheet instead and let me put it back into the database. In that case, the file would need a column with the ID in it so it can be matched.
Thank you for the information. In fact, I would prefer the csv option. Maybe we can arrange a short video call session, where you show me how to best export a csv from a table. (I might need that later anyways to process the data without Damast.)
(or the one mentioned in https://github.com/UniStuttgart-VISUS/damast/issues/85)
We (me and @rpbarczok) had some issues (#3, mainly from here) before because for the data export to DaRUS and the public version, we use the short name of the source to remove sources that shouldn't be in that. For that, the short name in the export script and the database need to match automatically, of course. But this only pertains to the source.short
and tag.tagname
fields, IIRC.
Maybe we can arrange a short video call session, where you show me how to best export a csv from a table.
Sure. Just let me know when you are free today.
I have changed that directly via pgAdmin. @rpbarczok, are the abbreviations used there the same as in the commentary regarding places? I changed two, one to e-GEDSH, one to EIr.
Yes, at least they should be. I am looking through the comments of every place instance at the moment but I am not finished yet. We should also, as discussed recently personally, discuss the shortnames in the DB. When we change them, we have to inform Max and look through the comments column of the place table again. But I do not use the short forms very often.
If I understood correctly from our discussion yesterday, some of the monographs will also be shortened, e.g. to Timm
.
Yes, I shortened all title that are used as sources of evidences. If you like we can meet and discuss them.
This issue can be closed, right, @rpbarczok ?
yes
Are the explanations following the URLs consistent throughout and stored at some central place, @mfranke93 ? E.g., I would change
to something like