Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It is not an issue with the current code, but a request to update the way it processes files with an extension before .liquid
Describe the solution you'd like
Description
I would also like to see support for the several possible forms of liquid, used in files with format ..liquid.
Match extensions - Info on what needs to be done
.html.liquid: - Beautified as HTML, then the result should be beautified as liquid. Current liquid formatters never seem to place control blocks on new lines such as {% if %} / {% endif %} and counterparts {%- if -%} / {%- endif -%} or {% for %} / {% endfor %} as examples. These tags should be placed on new lines matching parent line's indentation AFTER the file is formatted as regular HTML for best results.
.scss.liquid: - Beautified as SCSS, then the result should be beautified as liquid (explanation above.)
.js.liquid: - Beautified as JavaScript, then the result should be beautified as liquid (explanation above.)
.liquid - Beautified as Liquid only.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I have searched far and wide for a code formatter that works will with .liquid files and .html.liquid, etc. One doesn't exist yet. I believed your project was uniquely prepared to handle this as it integrates several other beautifiers so theoretically you could chain beautifiers to achieve a better result for these files.
Additional context
I realize that this would require a beautifier to run AFTER others in the chain, that performs the "control blocks on new lines" feature, so I will be looking into writing this myself and will submit a link to the github project once created. If you are able to allow for a new feature to chain beautifiers, I believe there would be other uses for this in other template languages as well.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. It is not an issue with the current code, but a request to update the way it processes files with an extension before .liquid
Describe the solution you'd like
Description
I would also like to see support for the several possible forms of liquid, used in files with format ..liquid.
Match extensions - Info on what needs to be done .html.liquid: - Beautified as HTML, then the result should be beautified as liquid. Current liquid formatters never seem to place control blocks on new lines such as {% if %} / {% endif %} and counterparts {%- if -%} / {%- endif -%} or {% for %} / {% endfor %} as examples. These tags should be placed on new lines matching parent line's indentation AFTER the file is formatted as regular HTML for best results. .scss.liquid: - Beautified as SCSS, then the result should be beautified as liquid (explanation above.) .js.liquid: - Beautified as JavaScript, then the result should be beautified as liquid (explanation above.) .liquid - Beautified as Liquid only.
Describe alternatives you've considered I have searched far and wide for a code formatter that works will with .liquid files and .html.liquid, etc. One doesn't exist yet. I believed your project was uniquely prepared to handle this as it integrates several other beautifiers so theoretically you could chain beautifiers to achieve a better result for these files.
Additional context I realize that this would require a beautifier to run AFTER others in the chain, that performs the "control blocks on new lines" feature, so I will be looking into writing this myself and will submit a link to the github project once created. If you are able to allow for a new feature to chain beautifiers, I believe there would be other uses for this in other template languages as well.