Closed stveit closed 1 week ago
Descriptor | Linter | Files | Fixed | Errors | Elapsed time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
β PYTHON | black | 992 | 0 | 11.14s | |
β PYTHON | ruff | 987 | 0 | 0.11s |
See detailed report in MegaLinter reports
ββββ9 filesββββββ9 suitesβββ8m 28s β±οΈ 2β139 testsβ2β139 β β0 π€β0 β 4β017 runsββ4β017 β β0 π€β0 β
Results for commit 46fd948d.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 60.39%. Comparing base (
9db1bbf
) to head (46fd948
). Report is 6 commits behind head on master.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
Turns out
FormCheckBox
needs to supportcss_classes
to fully replace the oldCheckBox
.This requires some change to how the templates are accessed. The changes in this PR makes it so the added argument
css_classes
is accessible in the html template. This could have been done the other way as well, but this is how the other classes that requirecss_classes
work.I do also think its a bit less "magic" to define the template directly, instead of using a keyword "checkbox" that maps to the correct template in another file. Better to just define the correct template directly in the class.