Closed ghost closed 6 months ago
Looks like someone already pointed out 3 years ago https://twitter.com/AlgorithmicBot/status/1355310629213659144
Think I misunderstood, the comment's purpose is to not define totalSupply before _mintFee function call so I think it suits the purpose so closing the PR.
This is a very funny joke, anyone who could read solidity codes can point out this comment is false ( Since totalSupply is already updated by _mintFee function which calls _mint to manipulate totalSupply value, there is no need to cache this thing at all! ).
Maybe we should stop laughing against uniswap forkers who forked the contract with this false comment and remove the code since they are already immutable on explorers.